The legal guidelines round cell phone use whereas driving are to be tightened beneath new UK authorities plans to make any use of a hand-held telephone unlawful. From 2022, cell phone regulation will likely be prolonged to cowl taking images or movies, scrolling via playlists or taking part in video games whereas driving or stationary, say, at a site visitors mild. Use of a cell phone ‘hands-free’, nevertheless, will nonetheless be allowed – though analysis reveals it’s equally distracting.
Currently, UK drivers utilizing a hand-held cell phone can solely be prosecuted if it may be confirmed that they have been utilizing it for an “interactive communicative perform” comparable to calling or texting. The change in the regulation closes this loophole, and makes it simpler for distracted drivers to be prosecuted, fined £200, and given six factors on their licence.
According to the UK authorities, 81% of people that responded to its session supported the transfer. This aligns with findings from roadside breakdown group RAC, whose annual report on motoring usually reveals that cell phone use by different drivers is a high concern for motorists.
But information additionally reveals that many drivers who declare to help the regulation nonetheless proceed to make use of their telephones whereas behind the wheel. One survey discovered that greater than 1 / 4 of drivers admitted to hand-held cell phone use, not less than sometimes.
So why do drivers who help the regulation, and acknowledge the risks of distracted driving, nonetheless use their telephones? The reply partly lies in driver attitudes and biases.
Read extra:
Car corporations are nonetheless pushing hands-free telephone tech – regardless of how harmful it’s
What the proof tells us
Research persistently reveals that the majority drivers contemplate themselves to be above common at driving. Statistically talking, after all, that is extremely unlikely. But this “self-enhancement bias” provides drivers a rationale for believing their cell phone use is secure, whereas condemning others for doing the similar factor.
Phone-using drivers justify their behaviour by claiming they can modify their cell phone use depending on the driving state of affairs, comparable to limiting use on busy roads. They consider they can multitask and mitigate the danger in a method that different drivers can’t.
Drivers with self-enhancement bias additionally usually exhibit “crash danger optimism” – judging themselves to be at decrease danger of a crash in comparison with different drivers.
In a way, each journey a self-perceived above-average driver efficiently completes whereas utilizing a cell phone seems to verify to them that their behaviour is suitable, and the regulation is aimed toward different drivers. This helps to elucidate why robust help for a tightened regulation on this space can coexist with excessive charges of offending.
Research tells us many drivers contemplate themselves to be above common at driving.
APM STOCK/Shutterstock
Education campaigns that, for instance, characteristic deadly or severe collisions attributable to a distracted driver can truly play into these biases. Such campaigns seem to verify drivers’ perception that they will deal with it, whereas these different “inferior” drivers couldn’t.
For these over-confident drivers, maybe the solely deterrent can be the risk of enforcement. But lately, numbers of devoted roads-policing officers in the UK have declined, and the public has, apparently, observed. In one survey, 54% of respondents felt they have been unlikely to be caught or punished for utilizing a hand-held cell phone whereas driving.
This mixture of circumstances makes it very troublesome to steer drivers that they shouldn’t use their cell phones behind the wheel. If a driver thinks they will safely multitask whereas additionally avoiding prosecution, what’s stopping them?
We want to alter attitudes
The tightening of the regulation could assist to encourage some drivers to consider their telephone use, nevertheless it appears unlikely it can solve the problem of cell phone use amongst drivers, and eradicate the hurt it causes.
In a broader sense, modifications to the regulation won’t ever be capable to hold tempo with new applied sciences. In-vehicle distractions, comparable to interactive screens on the dashboard and digital assistants like Alexa, are creating extra shortly than the regulation can sustain with.
If we need to scale back the variety of individuals killed and severely injured every year by drivers utilizing their cell phones, now we have to steer drivers to not do it no matter whether or not or not they’ll get caught.
We have to problem the narratives that drivers usually deploy to justify their behaviour, and handle driver biases head-on by offering training, primarily based on psychological proof, that’s more durable for drivers to withstand or deny. Interactive training, which permits drivers to expertise their very own distraction, fairly than listening to about the failures of others, can be place to begin.
If we don’t handle driver attitudes, we received’t meaningfully handle driver distraction, no matter what the regulation says.
Read extra:
Five very important issues you may’t do correctly if you’re in your telephone
