Intel hasn’t formally introduced the ~$185 Core i5-12400 and the chips aren’t speculated to be out there at retail but, however that did not cease us from snagging a chip and placing it to the check. We discovered that the Alder Lake Core i5-12400 delivers a shocking stage of efficiency in our CPU benchmarks, beating all comparable Ryzen chips and even a number of of the costlier fashions. Furthermore, with the appropriate tuning, it is even sooner at gaming than the $549 previous-gen Core i9-11900K flagship, elevating the bar for finances gaming chips because it joins our checklist of the Best CPUs for gaming.Intel’s 65W Core i5 SKUs have lengthy been the corporate’s greatest finances chips for avid gamers. The Core i5-12400, although at the moment not formally introduced, is anticipated to land with an analogous $185 advisable value as its predecessor. The six-core i5-12400’s potent mixture of value and efficiency, to not point out a reportedly vastly-improved inventory cooler, will dominate the $170 to $200 value vary.AMD deserted the sub-$200 market when it launched its Ryzen 5000 processors, leaving its older processors to carry the road. Oddly sufficient, the growing old Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 will stay the go-to opponents for the 12400 though they debuted practically two and a half years in the past. Sure, AMD launched the Ryzen 5 3600XT a yr later, however the overpriced XT chips barely introduced any significant efficiency enhancements and stay arduous to search out.For now, AMD’s lowest level of entry into its Zen 3-powered Ryzen 5000 collection comes within the type of the $259 Ryzen 5 5600G. This APU is the very best worth in the marketplace if you happen to’re seeking to recreation at decrease resolutions with out a discrete GPU. But except for gaming on the iGPU, it will possibly’t compete with the Core i5-12400 and comes at a far larger value level.
U.S. ValueCores | ThreadsP-Core Base/BoostE-Core Base/BoostTDP / PBP / MTPDDR4-3200L3 CacheCore i9-12900K / KF$589 (Okay) – $564 (KF)8P + 8E | 16 Cores / 24 Threads3.2 / 5.2 GHz2.4 / 3.9 GHz125W / 241WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480030MBCore i7-12700K / KF$409 (Okay) – $384 (KF)8P + 4E | 12 Cores / 20 Threads3.6 / 5.0 GHz2.7 / 3.8 GHz125W / 190WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480025MBCore i5-12600K / KF$289 (Okay) – $264 (KF)6P + 4E | 10 Cores / 16 Threads3.7 / 4.9 GHz2.8 / 3.6 GHz125W / 150WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480016MBCore i5-12400 / FEstimated ~ $185 – $1606P + 0E | 6 Cores / 12 Threads4.4 / ~2.5 GHzn/a65W / 117WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480018MB
That leaves Intel unchecked within the worth section, including to the corporate’s newfound dominance with the Alder Lake chips that even outperform costlier Ryzen 5000 chips throughout the complete vary. As we are able to see with the $589 Core i9-12900K vs $799 Ryzen 9 5950X, the $408 Core i7-12700K vs $549 Ryzen 9 5900X, and the $289 Core i5-12600K vs $390 Ryzen 7 5800X (click on the hyperlinks for the complete rundown), Alder Lake actually punches above its pricing weight class.However, platform pricing has been a sore level for the Alder Lake household. While Intel’s chips are inexpensive than AMD’s, the corporate at the moment solely has its costly Z690 motherboards on provide, decreasing its worth proposition for the lower-end processors. However, that is rumored to vary later this week when B600 motherboards come to market, offering an awesome pairing for the Core i5-12400 and easing platform pricing issues.Surprisingly, Alder Lake’s efficiency benefits come even with out its help for DDR5 reminiscence and PCIe 5.0 interfaces (each of which Intel delivered to market first). You can use commonplace DDR4 reminiscence and PCIe 4.0 gadgets to unlock superior efficiency over AMD’s growing old AM4 platform. We suspect that the majority B- and H-series boards will leverage less-expensive DDR4 reminiscence on account of ongoing DDR5 shortages. Fortunately, most B- and H-series motherboards can even in all probability come with out PCIe 5.0 as a cost-reducing measure. All of which means a Core i5 system paired with a B660 motherboard might be the killer worth combo.Alder Lake additionally brings one other innovation — the hybrid x86 design represents the corporate’s most disruptive architectural shift in a decade. The higher-end Alder Lake chips mix huge and quick Performance cores (P-cores) with clusters of small and highly effective Efficiency cores (E-cores) that chew via background processes. The Golden Cove structure powers the ‘huge’ P-cores, whereas the ‘little’ E-cores include the Gracemont structure.However, the Core i5-12400 would not have a hybrid structure. Instead, it comes with a extra conventional design and solely has six P-Cores lively, so it would not use Gracemont-based cores for background duties. That means this six-core 12-thread processor would not want Intel’s new Windows 11-exclusive Thread Director know-how to position workloads on the right cores. As a consequence, not like Intel’s hybrid fashions, the 12400 is simply as potent in Windows 10 as it’s in Windows 11.As you may see in our benchmarks under, the 65W Core i5-12400 is a stellar gaming chip that simply outperforms all of AMD’s competing chips. In reality, the $185 Core i5-12400 is quicker than the $299 Ryzen 5 5600X in gaming. After tuning, the 12400 can be sooner than the Core i9-11900K at gaming, courtesy of Intel’s reminiscence overclocking help on B- and H-series motherboards. Overall, the Core i5-12400 is the brand new gaming champ. This is a evaluate of an unreleased product, so we do not have all of the official particulars but. But now we have the chip, which tells us every thing we have to learn about efficiency. We additionally examined the 12400 with overclocked reminiscence and limitless energy settings, which gives a pleasant little bit of uplift. So let’s take a fast have a look at the specs we all know, then get to the benchmarks. Intel Alder Lake-S Core i5-12400 Specifications and PricingWe have deep-dive protection of the Alder Lake SoC design and core microarchitectures right here, together with a broader overview in our Alder Lake all we all know article. Additionally, Intel has eliminated its ‘TDP’ (Thermal Design Point) nomenclature from the spec sheets, and now assigns a Processor Base Power (PBP) worth as an alternative. The firm additionally added a secondary Maximum Turbo Power (MTP) worth to the spec sheets to symbolize the best energy stage throughout increase exercise. You can learn extra about that change right here.Intel fabs Alder Lake on the ‘Intel 7’ course of. We beforehand knew this ‘Intel 7’ manufacturing tech as 10nm Enhanced SuperFin, however Intel lately renamed its course of nodes to match trade nomenclature. Technically, that is the second technology of Intel’s 10nm course of, but it surely’s a primary for desktop PCs.
U.S. ValueCores | ThreadsP-Core Base/BoostE-Core Base/BoostTDP / PBP / MTPDDR4-3200L3 CacheCore i7-12700K / KF$409 (Okay) – $384 (KF)8P + 4E | 12 Cores / 20 threads3.6 / 5.0 GHz2.7 / 3.8 GHz125W / 190WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480025MBRyzen 7 5800X$4498P | 16 threads3.8 / 4.7 GHz-105WDDR4-320032MBCore i5-12600K / KF$289 (Okay) – $264 (KF)6P + 4E | 10 Cores / 16 threads3.7 / 4.9 GHz2.8 / 3.6 GHz125W / 150WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480016MBRyzen 5 5600X$2996P | 12 threads3.7 / 4.6 GHz-65WDDR4-320032MBRyzen 5 5600G$2596 / 123.9 / 4.4-65W DDR4-320016MBCore i5-12400 / FEstimated ~ $185 – $1606P + 0E | 6 Cores / 12 Threads 4.4 / ~2.5 GHzn/a65W / 117WDDR4-3200 / DDR5-480018MBCore i5-11400 / F$182 – $1576 / 122.6 / 4.2-65WDDR4-293312MBRyzen 5 3600X$2406 / 123.8 / 4.4 -95WDDR4-320032MBRyzen 5 3600$2006 / 123.6 / 4.2-65WDDR4-320032MB
All Alder Lake chips help DDR4-3200 or as much as DDR5-4800 reminiscence, however caveats apply. PCIe help will range by motherboard, however Alder Lake chips expose as much as 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 (technically for storage and graphics solely, no networking gadgets) and an extra 4 lanes of PCIe 4.0 from the chip for M.2 storage.We do not have the complete official specs for the Core i5-12400 but. Instead, we’re relying upon what we have seen in quite a few leaks and what we have noticed in our check setting. The 12400 comes with a 65W PBP (base) and 117W MTP (peak) energy score. We clocked the chip working at a 2.5 GHz base and boosting as much as 4.4 GHz. The chip additionally comes with 18 MB of L3 cache.The Core i5-12400 is a locked chip, which means it is not overclockable. However, Intel helps reminiscence overclocking on Z690, B660, and H670 motherboards (Z690 would not make sense for this class of chip, although). As you may quickly see, manipulating the ability limits serves as a quasi-overclock that may eke out some extra efficiency in some gaming and threaded work. The commonplace Core i7-12400 comes with the UHD Graphics 730 engine with 32 EUs. We clocked it working at 300 / 1300 MHz base/increase frequencies. If you are wanting to avoid wasting coin, the graphics-less Core i5-12400F will include a $25 value discount (if custom holds) and have the identical specs because the 12400, which is extremely enticing if you happen to plan on utilizing a discrete graphics card. Notably, you’ll lose Quick Sync capabilities and the iGPU fallback that you should use for troubleshooting within the occasion of a problem with a discrete GPU. However, there additionally is not an possibility for graphics on AMD’s price-comparable Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600.The $289 Core i5-12600K comes as the following step up the Alder Lake ladder. It comes with six threaded P-cores that function at 3.7 / 4.9 GHz and 4 E-cores that run at 2.8 / 3.6 GHz, for a complete of 16 threads. That’s paired with 20MB of L3 and 9.5MB of L2 cache. Naturally, overclockability is an enormous attraction with the 12600K, however you should not underestimate the E-cores — they supply fairly a bit extra heft in threaded work, serving to the 12600K earn its larger price ticket.Intel’s Alder Lake drops into Socket 1700 motherboards from the 600-series, together with Z690, H670, B660, and H610. The latter three are anticipated to be introduced this week. Core i5-12400 Die Details(Image credit score: MSI)MSI lately confirmed by way of a livestream that Intel makes use of two completely different dies for the Alder Lake collection: One die has eight P-cores and eight E-cores (8P+8E), and one other has simply six P-cores (6+0). Obviously, the latter die is far smaller and thus cheaper, subsequently making way more sense to be used within the non-hybrid Alder Lake chips with six or fewer cores.However, leaked testing signifies that the Core i5-12400 chips range on a chip-to-chip foundation and might include both die sort. That means C0 stepping chips like ours even have a complete of eight P-cores and eight E-cores, however Intel disables the additional cores to trim it right down to a 6+0 design. Naturally, that helps the corporate promote bigger dies that encounter defects throughout manufacturing. It might additionally assist enhance provide and manufacturing effectivity when there aren’t sufficient ‘excellent’ defect-free 6+0 dies out there.The bodily distinction between the dies — the 8P+8E design’s ring bus extends to cowl the disabled E-cores and P-Cores — implies that the H0-stepping 6+0 dies may have decrease core-to-core latencies. That might theoretically result in barely sooner efficiency below sure circumstances. Additionally, anecdotal proof additionally means that the H0 chips require much less energy. We’re working to supply an H0 chip for comparability and can comply with up as needed. Test SetupWe examined with Windows 11 and DDR4 reminiscence on a Z690 motherboard (B660 is not out there but). We’re utilizing a publicly-available BIOS that permits the chip to fulfill its rated specs, however it’s potential that future BIOS releases might unlock an additional little bit of efficiency. Additionally, the ability monitoring software program that we sometimes use is not but optimized for the 12400’s energy telemetry. As such, we solely have sparse energy metrics they usually might be topic to a little bit of variance. We’ll replace the article with extra detailed energy measurements as soon as we have sorted that concern. The Core i5-12400 is a locked chip, however you possibly can overclock the reminiscence on Z-, B- and a few H-series motherboards. We’re sticking with our commonplace coverage of permitting the motherboard to exceed Intel’s advisable energy limits, offered the chip stays inside warrantied working circumstances. Some of our checks use the default lifted PL1 and PL2 restrictions. Almost all enthusiast-class motherboards include comparable settings, so this displays the out-of-box expertise with a high-end motherboard. These lifted energy limits can function a type of quasi-overclock (albeit not as efficient) that can increase efficiency in some threaded functions and gaming, all whereas technically remaining inside the definition of inventory settings, and thus warrantied. We measured a peak of 98W with the limitless energy settings throughout a Blender workload, however we’ll comply with up with extra detailed energy stats quickly.Naturally, these lifted energy limits equate to extra energy consumption, and thus extra warmth. MSI motherboards additionally include a advisable energy profile for a inventory cooler, which we put to the check to check efficiency. However, we do not have a inventory cooler for the Core i5-12400 but, so we used this profile with the Corsair H115i watercooler that we use as an ordinary on our check benches. We’ll add testing with the inventory cooler to this text as soon as it arrives. MSI claims the boxed cooler can maintain these settings, however the MTP/PL2 of 169W (128-second Turbo length) is above Intel’s advisable 117W / 56-second increase. We measured a peak of 86W with these settings. We’ll add testing with the inventory cooler at each 169W/117W MTP settings quickly. We examined the Core i5-12400 in three completely different configurations:Core i5-12400 NoPL DDR4-3800: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, energy limits eliminated, reminiscence overclocked to DDR4-3800 in Gear 1 mode (Gear 2 leads to efficiency regressions)Core i5-12400: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, energy limits eliminated, Stock DDR4-3200 in Gear 1Core i5-12400 StockPL: Corsair H115i 280mm water cooler, PL1=65W, PL2=169W, 128-second increase (Tau), Stock DDR4-3200 in Gear 1We additionally examined with safe boot, virtualization help, and fTPM/PTT lively to mirror a correctly configured Windows 11 set up. We have a full breakdown of the check system configurations on the finish of the article.Intel Core i5-12400 Gaming Benchmarks — The TLDRAs common, we’re testing with an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3090 to cut back GPU-imposed bottlenecks as a lot as potential, and variations between check topics will shrink with lesser playing cards or larger resolutions. Because many of the titles under present little significant differentiation at larger resolutions, we solely examined 4 of the seven titles at 1440p.Image 1 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Paired with reasonably priced DDR4 reminiscence on the 1080p decision, the previous-gen flagship $584 Core i9-11900K is a scant 2.5% sooner than the ~$185 Core i5-12400, however tuning the Core i5’s reminiscence to DDR4-3800 offers it a 1.9% lead over the inventory 11900K in our cumulative efficiency measurement. Naturally, the Core i9-11900K would take the lead after overclocking, but it surely’s spectacular that the 12400 may even compete, not to mention beat, the inventory 11900K. The 12400 additionally beat the Core i7-11700K and Core i5-11400 by 4.5% and eight.4%, respectively, so the resale worth of Rocket Lake chips simply dropped much more.At inventory settings, the Core i5-12400 at inventory settings is 1.9% sooner than AMD’s venerable ~$299 Ryzen 5 5600X. After tuning, the Core i5-12400 ties the overclocked 5600X, a formidable exhibiting for a chip that prices $110 much less.It feels unfair to check the Ryzen 5 5600G to the Core i5-12400; AMD’s APU is not designed as a direct competitor and is costlier than the 12400. However, except for the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, the $249 5600G is the one AMD processor near this value class. Regardless, with a discrete GPU, the Core i5-12400 is 16.8% sooner than the 5600G and 14% sooner after tuning each chips.The Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 additionally really feel like odd comparisons to the 12400 — each are a number of years previous and have the previous-gen Zen 2 structure. But, once more, these are the one appropriate comparables from the AMD camp. The Core i5-12400 is 22.7% and 26% sooner than the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, respectively. As you possibly can think about, overclocking the Ryzen chips would not do a lot to shut that chasm.At inventory settings, the Core i5-12600K is 2.5% sooner than the 12400, a comparatively slim lead given its ~$105 premium over the 12400. (However, we should not underestimate the ability of the 12600K’s E-cores for recreation streaming.) Interestingly, turning off the 12600K’s E-cores, basically making it a 12400 with larger clocks, boosts its lead over the 12400 to 7.3%.The Core i5-12400 positive aspects 4.5% extra efficiency from overclocked reminiscence however nonetheless trails the more-expensive overclocked Core i5-12600K fairly a bit (we obtained a 15% enchancment from overclocking the Alder Lake 12600K). After tuning, the Core i5-12600K is 11.5% sooner than the 12400, which means the Core i5-12600K earns its price ticket for overclockers.
1080p Gaming Benchmarks %age Relative to Core i9-12900K with DDR4
Tom’s Hardware 1080p Game Benchmarks – fps %age Core i9-12900K DDR4100%Core i9-12700K DDR498.9%Core i5-12400 noPL DDR4-380092%Core i5-12600K DDR490.3%Core i9-11900K90.3%Core i5-1240088%Core i5-12400 StockPL86.9%Core i5-11700K84%Ryzen 5 5600G73.1%Ryzen 5 3600X68%
We have not examined the Core i5-12400 with DDR5 reminiscence but — we’ll look forward to an acceptable B660 motherboard — however we have noticed that DDR4 is usually akin to DDR5 in gaming with variances that rely upon the title. Additionally, DDR5 is at the moment topic to eye-watering value premiums that utterly take away it as a rational possibility for this class of chip.Naturally, shifting over to 1440p brings a GPU bottleneck into the equation, so the efficiency deltas between the chips shrink tremendously. If you recreation at larger resolutions and do not plan to improve your GPU before you purchase your subsequent CPU, these outcomes present a great perspective.Flipping via the 99th percentile charts for each resolutions additionally reveals bigger deltas, however now we have to view these with warning as Windows 11 remains to be younger and appears to undergo from extra framerate variability than our Windows 10 check platform.The Core i5-12400 simply beats the Ryzen comparables, however bear in mind that enormous efficiency deltas in a couple of of the sport titles can closely impression a majority of these general measurements. It’s at all times greatest to make an knowledgeable resolution primarily based on the sorts of titles you play incessantly, so be sure you try the person recreation benchmarks under.Overall it is clear that the Core i5-12400 is now the finances gaming champion, providing a superior stage of efficiency at its value level with no clear opponents.3DMark, VRMark, Chess Engines on Intel Core i5-12400Image 1 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Synthetic benchmarks do not are likely to translate effectively to real-world gaming, however they do present us the uncooked quantity of compute energy uncovered to recreation engines. It’s too unhealthy most video games do not totally exploit it. Far Cry 6 on Core i5-12400Image 1 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)F1 2021 on Intel Core i5-12400Image 1 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Hitman 3 on Core i5-12400Image 1 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Horizon Zero Dawn on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Microsoft Flight Simulator 2021 on Core i5-12400Image 1 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Red Dead Redemption 2 on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Watch Dogs Legion on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Core i5-12400 Application Benchmarks — The TLDRImage 1 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of two(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)We can boil down productiveness utility efficiency into two broad classes: single- and multi-threaded. These slides present the geometric imply of efficiency in a number of of our most essential checks in every class, however be sure you have a look at the expanded benchmark outcomes additional under.The Core i5-12400 is spectacular in our cumulative measure of single-threaded efficiency. As anticipated, we do not see any significant variations between the 12400’s completely different energy settings, however the 12400 would not want an excessive amount of assist. The chip is 2.3% sooner than the Core i9-11900K, 6% sooner than the 11700K, and an unimaginable 15.7% sooner than the 11400.Zooming out to the Ryzen comparables reveals that the 12400 is 13.5% sooner than the Ryzen 5 5600G in single-threaded work (10% sooner after tuning the 5600G), and a whopping 24% and 27% sooner than the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, respectively. You’ll should look to different Alder Lake chips to search out sooner efficiency in single-threaded work — as you possibly can see in our CPU Benchmark hierarchy, even the vaunted Ryzen 9 5950X is not as quick because the Core i5-12400 in single-threaded work.We can see the benefit of uncorking the ability restrictions in threaded workloads, because the Core i5-12400 is 7% sooner after our alterations. That mentioned, we see a distinct image in threaded productiveness work the place the 12400 clearly is not in the identical league as Ryzen 9 chips.However, the 12400 remains to be loads aggressive in opposition to the Ryzen 5 fashions, even beating the vaunted Ryzen 5 5600X by 2.3% at commonplace settings and 6.7% after tuning each chips. That’s spectacular given the 12400’s rather more forgiving price ticket, however as you may see within the benchmarks under, the Ryzen 5 5600X does carve out wins in various threaded functions. We see bigger positive aspects over the Ryzen 5 5600G, 3600X and 3600, with the inventory 12400 taking leads of 15.8%, 22.4%, and 23.6%, respectively. Frankly, AMD simply would not have any worthy competing chips at this value level for this sort of work.The Core i5-12600K earns its price ticket for threaded productiveness duties: The 12600K is ~21.7% sooner in threaded work than the 12400, and that proportion climbs in some workloads. As you possibly can see by the outcomes with the 12600K’s E-cores disabled, these tiny little E-cores pull numerous weight in threaded work. Overall, the 12600K is 12.3% sooner with the E-cores lively than it’s with them disabled.The 12400 might not have as a lot threaded heft because the 12600K due to its lack of E-cores, but it surely does fairly effectively in opposition to the previous-gen Core i5-11400 with a 12.4% lead. As anticipated, it will possibly’t hold tempo with the 11900K and 11700K in threaded work.Overall the Core i5-12400 provides an exquisite mix of efficiency in each single- and multi-threaded apps given its value level. You’ll should look to Intel’s personal Alder Lake household for sooner single-threaded efficiency, and the 12400 beats the price-comparable Ryzen fashions (and even the $110 costlier Ryzen 5 5600X) in threaded functions by convincing margins.
Percentage Relative to Core i9-12900K with DDR4
Tom’s Hardware – Application BenchmarksSingle-ThreadedMulti-ThreadedCore i9-12900K DDR4100percent100%Core i9-12700K DDR497.3percent85.7%Core i5-12600K DDR495.9percent66.6%Core i5-12400 noPL DDR4-380087.1percent52.2%Core i5-1240086.9percent52.2%Core i5-12400 StockPL87.1percent48.8%Core i9-11900K84.9percent63.3%Core i5-11700K81.8percent63.9%Ryzen 5 5600G75.1percent43.9%Ryzen 5 3600X66percent40.5%
Rendering Benchmarks on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 6 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 7 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 8 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 9 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 10 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 11 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 12 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 13 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)AMD’s onslaught in opposition to Intel started with a commanding lead in rendering work, notably Cinebench. However, that lead has waned with the arrival of Alder Lake, because the Core i5-12400 takes a considerably slim lead over the Ryzen 5 5600X in each the Cinebench single- and multi-threaded checks whereas taking rather more substantial leads over the 5600G, 3600X, and 3600. The 12400 is especially robust in single-threaded rendering duties however equally adept within the threaded benchmarks. Overall, the Core i5-12400 dominates the comparably-priced Ryzen chips in these checks. AMD’s strongest exhibiting in these checks comes from the $300 Ryzen 5 5600X throughout the C-Ray and Corona benchmarks. The 5600X can be robust within the 4 Blender renders, but it surely wins two and loses two, equating to a wash. Encoding Benchmarks on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 6 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 7 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 8 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 9 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 10 of 10(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Web Browsing on Intel Core i5-12400Image 1 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 4(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)The ubiquitous internet browser is among the most incessantly used functions. These checks are typically evenly threaded, so a quick response time is essential. The Core i5-12400 beats all competing Ryzen processors in Jetstream 2 and ARES-6, however the Ryzen 5 5600X edges previous in WebXPRT 3. The Microsoft Edge browser is our lone instance of a browser that advantages from threaded horsepower. Here the Core i5-12400 beats all competing Ryzen chips, proving it’s fairly versatile in browser work. Adobe Premiere Pro, Photoshop, and Lightroom on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 6 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)We’ve built-in the UL Benchmarks Procyon checks into our suite to interchange the growing old PCMark 10. This new benchmark runs complicated Adobe Premiere Pro, Photoshop, and Lightroom workflows with the precise software program, making for an awesome real-world check suite. The Core i5-12400 trails the Ryzen 5 5600X and overclocked 5600G within the Adobe Premiere Pro video modifying benchmarks however takes the lead within the Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop photograph modifying benchmarks. Office and Productivity on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 5(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)The Core i5-12400 gives snappy utility load instances, however the Ryzen 5 5600G and 5600X are sooner, which is not too stunning given their larger value factors. Conversely, the 12400 beats all the competing Ryzen chips within the Microsoft Office suite. Compilation, Compression, AVX Benchmarks on Core i5-12400Image 1 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 6 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 7 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 8 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 9 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 10 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 11 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 12 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 13 of 13(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)This seize bag of varied checks finds the Core i5-12400 scoring a number of extra wins. From the exceedingly branchy code within the LLVM compilation workload to the massively parallel molecular dynamics simulation code in NAMD, the 12400 is spectacular.Meanwhile, AMD’s higher-end Ryzen 5 5600X carves out wins within the NAMD, compression/decompression, and encryption workloads. Still, all the price-comparable Ryzen fashions path the Core i5-12400 throughout the complete gamut of checks. Budget Gaming DominanceLike the remainder of the Alder Lake household, the Core i5-12400 will come to market with disruptive pricing on account of Intel’s bare-knuckle value conflict with AMD. That’s notably painful for AMD as Intel assaults the sub-$200 section that AMD has largely deserted.As a consequence, the ~$185 Core i5-12400 even beats the $299 Ryzen 5 5600X and $259 Ryzen 5 5600G in key areas. Putting the Core i5-12400 up in opposition to AMD’s price-comparable fashions is not a good combat; the Core i5-12400 beats them by enormous margins, however that is as a result of the $240 Ryzen 5 3600X and $199 Ryzen 5 3600 leverage the growing old Zen 2 structure. They’re additionally dealing with an amazing competitor. Consider this: With the appropriate tuning, the 12400 is even barely sooner at 1080p gaming than the previous-gen $549 Core i9-11900K flagship at inventory settings, which is spectacular.Intel’s Alder Lake pricing is stable, however the firm’s resolution to initially deliver solely Z690 motherboards to market took a little bit of the shine off the worth proposition at launch. However, we’re on the cusp of the discharge of the extra reasonably priced B- and H-series motherboards, which ought to deliver a a lot decrease value of entry to the Alder Lake platform. Unfortunately, we do not have particulars of these motherboards to share but, however we’re certain that you will study extra within the coming days. Below, now we have the geometric imply of our gaming check suite at 1080p and 1440p and a cumulative measure of efficiency in single- and multi-threaded functions. Remember that we performed the gaming checks with an RTX 3090, so efficiency deltas will shrink with lesser playing cards and better decision and constancy settings. Image 1 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 2 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 3 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 4 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 5 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)Image 6 of 6(Image credit score: Tom’s Hardware)The Core i5-12400 eschews the hybrid Alder Lake design, as a substitute going with solely six P-cores. That would not maintain the chip again in gaming, although, and the Core i5-12400 now reigns because the finances gaming CPU champ.There are numerous spectacular 12400 gaming stats to throw round, however some are extra telling than others. For occasion, the Core i5-12400 is 1.9% sooner than AMD’s venerable ~$299 Ryzen 5 5600X at inventory settings. Overclocking each chips yields a tie, a formidable exhibiting contemplating the 12400 is ~$110 much less. The Core i5-12400 can be 16.8% sooner than the $250 Ryzen 5 5600G.AMD’s resolution to prioritize higher-end, higher-margin chips makes good enterprise sense, but it surely leaves the complete high-volume finances section to Intel. As a consequence, AMD’s Zen 2-powered $240 Ryzen 5 3600X and $200 Ryzen 5 3600 are the corporate’s solely price-comparable chips. Still, they’re woefully unprepared for the onslaught: The Core i5-12400 is 22.7% and 26% sooner in 1080p gaming than the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, respectively.The 12400 is simply as spectacular in lightly-threaded apps. In reality, not a single Ryzen processor beat the Core i5-12400 in our cumulative measure of single-threaded efficiency, and that features the $800 Ryzen 9 5950X. The margins in opposition to AMD’s comparable chips aren’t slim, both. You’ll should look to different Alder Lake chips to search out sooner efficiency in single-threaded work.The Core i5-12400’s generational enhancements in threaded work are a bit tamer. It is ‘solely’ 12.4% sooner than the previous-gen Core i5-11400, however we nonetheless see spectacular efficiency over the Ryzen competitors. Even although the 5600X carves out some wins in some functions, at inventory settings, the 12400 is 2.3% sooner than the 5600X in our cumulative measure of threaded work and 6.7% sooner after overclocking. That’s stunning given the pricing delta. Frankly, AMD would not have any worthy competing chips for threaded work on the 12400’s value level. We see bigger leads for the 12400 over the Ryzen 5 5600G, 3600X, and 3600, with the Core i5-12400 taking leads of 15.8%, 22.4%, and 23.6%, respectively.That means the Core i5-12400 wins in opposition to the price-comparable Ryzen chips in each efficiency class, and even beat the costlier fashions. Of course, you even have to contemplate you could get the graphics-less Core i5-12400F for ~$25 much less, which is a wonderful value level for entry to this stage of efficiency. Given the 12400’s spectacular price-to-performance ratio, the query turns into whether or not it is value it to step as much as the Core i5-12600K. If you are targeted totally on gaming, the Core i5-12600K is 2.5% sooner at inventory settings, which is not definitely worth the premium. However, the 12600K earns its price ticket if you happen to’re overclocking. The 12600K is among the greatest overclockers we have seen in a number of chip gens, delivering as much as 15% larger gaming efficiency after tuning. That offers it an 11.5% lead over a tuned 12400. The 12600K additionally proves its value in threaded functions, the place it’s ~21.7% sooner than the 12400, totally on the power of its 4 extra E-cores.The Core i5-12400 has a way more trendy platform than AMD’s AM4 ecosystem. Leading-edge DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 interfaces add some value, however help for DDR4 and the choice for PCIe 4.0-only B660 motherboards assist scale back that overhead. You will not want DDR5 reminiscence to unlock the very best gaming efficiency, and that is a great factor as a result of DDR5’s excessive pricing would not make sense for this class of chip.Alder Lake has delivered a decisive blow to AMD’s complete Ryzen 5000 household. AMD will reply with its 3D V-Cache processors with as much as 192MB of L3 cache per chip, imparting as much as 15% extra gaming efficiency. Those chips arrive subsequent yr, however we’re undecided if the added premium of the 3D V-Cache will make it value manufacturing souped-up Ryzen 5 fashions that will probably be aggressive with the Core i5-12400. Time will inform.The 12400 serves up stable efficiency in all method of threaded productiveness functions, and its snappy single-threaded efficiency beats even the quickest Ryzen 5000 processors. Additionally, the Core i5-12400 delivers unimaginable ranges of gaming efficiency however at a a lot lower cost level than any comparable AMD processor, setting a brand new bar for finances gaming chips. For avid gamers on the lookout for the very best worth, the Core i5-12400 is now the uncontested greatest finances CPU for gaming, whereas the Core i5-12600K is the best choice for overclockers.
Core i9-12900K and Core i5-12600K Test System Configurations
Intel Socket 1700 DDR4 (Z690)Core i7-12700K, Core i5-12600K, Core i5-12400MSI Z690A WiFi DDR42x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Stock: DDR4-3200 14-14-14-36Intel Socket 1200 (Z590)Core i9-11900K, Core i7-11700K, Core i5-11400MSI Z590 Godlike2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Stock DDR4-3200/2933 Gear 1AMD Socket AM4 (X570)Ryzen 5 5600X, 5600G, 3600X, 3600MSI MEG X570 Godlike2x 8GB Trident Z Royal DDR4-3600 – Stock: DDR4-3200 14-14-14-36All SystemsGigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle – Gaming and ProViz functionsNvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FE – Application tests2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 PlusSilverstone ST1100-TIOpen BenchtableArctic MX-4 TIMWindows 11 ProCoolingCorsair H115i, Custom loop
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-core-i5-12400-review
