Intel i7-12700K Vs i5-13600K: Which Is Better?

Intel CPUs are the most well-liked pc processors on the planet. Intel has lately unveiled its thirteenth era of processors. The 13600K is the core i5 processor of this newest era, whereas the 12700K is the core i7 processor of Intel’s penultimate (twelfth) era. The goal of this information is core i7-12700K vs. i5-13600K.
Both CPUs are perfect for day by day use and have outstanding efficiency in demanding duties and gaming. This information will undergo all of the traits and sides of those two CPUs that may help you to find the higher one. To begin the information, let’s discuss concerning the specs of two processors. Also, you may need to take a look at our information on Intel i7-13700K vs i7-12700K.

Key Takeaways

The core i5-13600K has twice as many effectivity cores because the i7-12700K, and Intel i7-12700K has extra efficiency cores. Overall, the Intel i5-13600K has extra complete cores than the core i7-12700K.
While the bottom frequencies of cores of i7-12700K are increased, the Intel i5-13600K seems with increased increase frequencies.
The two processors’ gaming efficiency is great and comparable. Though, the common interpretation continues to favor the core i5-13600K.
In core i7-12700K vs. core i5-13600K, the Intel i5-13600K gives a extra acceptable deal for the cash.

Intel Core i7-12700K
The Core i7-12700K was unleashed by Intel in This fall’21. The following options have been included on this CPU by Intel.
General Specs

Architecture: Alder Lake
Socket Supported: FCLGA1700
Codename: Products previously Alder Lake
Lithography: Intel 7
Total Cores: 12
No. of Performance-cores: 8
No. of Efficient-cores: 4
Total Threads: 20
Processor measurement: 45.0 mm x 37.5 mm
Performance-core Base Frequency: 3.60 GHz
Efficient-core Base Frequency: 2.70 GHz
Performance-core Max Turbo Frequency: 4.90 GHz
Efficient-core Max Turbo Frequency: 3.80 GHz
CPU Max Turbo Frequency: 5.00 GHz
Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Frequency: 5.00 GHz
Cache: 25 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Total L2 Cache: 12 MB
Die Size: 215.25 mm²
Instruction Set: 64-bit
Instruction Set Extensions: Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel® Gaussian & Neural Accelerator: 3.0
Maximum Junction Temperature: 100°C
Thermal Solution Specification PCG: 2020A
Processor Base Power 125 W
Maximum Turbo Power 190 W
Direct Media Interface (DMI) Revision: 4.0
Total no. of DMI Lanes: 8
Scalability: 1S Only
PCI Express Revision: 5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express Configurations: Up to 1×16+4, 2×8+4
Maximum no. of PCI Express Lanes: 20

Memory Specs

Supported sort: Both DDR5 and DDR4
Max Memory Size: 128 GB (May fluctuate with reminiscence sort)
Memory Speed:

Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s
Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s

Total no. of Memory Channels 2
Maximum Memory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported: Yes

Graphics specs

Integrated Graphics: Yes
Graphics Model: Intel® UHD Graphics 770
Execution Units: 32
GPU Base clock: 300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic clock: 1.50 GHz
Multi-Format Codec Engines: 2
Total no. of Displays Supported: 4
DirectX* Support: 12
Graphics Output: eDP 1.4b, DP 1.4a, HDMI 2.1
Max Resolution (HDMI): 4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max Resolution (DP): 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max Resolution (eDP – Integrated Flat Panel): 5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz

Intel Core i5-13600K
In This fall of 2022, Intel launched the Core i5-13600K. Intel has included the next traits into this CPU.
General Specs

Architecture: Raptor Lake
Socket Supported: FCLGA1700
Codename: Products previously Raptor Lake
Lithography: Intel 7
Total Cores: 14
No. of Performance-cores: 6
No. of Efficient-cores: 8
Total Threads: 20
Performance-core Base Frequency: 3.50 GHz
Efficient-core Base Frequency: 2.60 GHz
Performance-core Max Turbo Frequency: 5.10 GHz
Efficient-core Max Turbo Frequency: 3.90 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency: 5.10 GHz
Cache: 24 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Total L2 Cache: 20 MB
Die Size: 257 mm²
Instruction Set: 64-bit
Instruction Set Extensions: Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
Intel® Gaussian & Neural Accelerator: 3.0
Maximum Junction Temperature: 100°C
Processor Base Power 125 W
Maximum Turbo Power 181 W
Direct Media Interface (DMI) Revision: 4.0
Total no. of DMI Lanes: 8
Scalability: 1S Only
PCI Express Revision: 5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express Configurations: Up to 1×16+4, 2×8+4
Maximum no. of PCI Express Lanes: 20

Memory Specs

Supported sort: Both DDR5 and DDR4
Max Memory Size: 128 GB (May fluctuate with reminiscence sort)
Memory Speed:

Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s
Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s

Total no. of Memory Channels 2
Maximum Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory Supported: Yes

Integrated Graphics

Intel Core i7-12700K Vs. i5-13600K
Technical Differences

FunctionIntel core i7-12700KIntel core i5-13600K

ArchitectureAlder LakeRaptor Lake

CoresP-cores: 8E-cores: 4Total cores: 12P-cores: 6E-cores: 8Total cores: 14

Clock pace P-coresBase frequency: 3.60 GHzTurbo frequency: 4.90 GHzBase frequency: 3.50 GHzTurbo frequency: 5.10 GHz

Clock pace E-coresBase frequency: 2.70 GHzTurbo frequency: 3.80 GHzBase frequency: 2.60 GHzTurbo frequency: 3.90 GHz

CPU max Turbo Clock5.00 GHzIntel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Frequency: 5.00 GHZ5.10 GHzIntel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0 Frequency: Not supported

Die Size215.25 mm²257 mm²

MemoryMemory Speed: Up to DDR5 4800 MT/sMemory Bandwidth: 76.8 GB/sMemory Speed: Up to DDR5 5600 MT/sMemory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s

Caches SizeL2 cache: 12 MBIntel® Smart Cache(L3): 25 MBL2 cache: 20 MBIntel® Smart Cache(L3): 24 MB

TDPBase energy: 125 WTurbo energy: 190 WBase energy: 125 WTurbo energy: 181 W

Architecture (Alder Lake Vs. Raptor Lake)
When evaluating the options of core i7-12700K vs. core i5-13600K, the architectures of processors are notably necessary. The core i7-12700K has a hybrid structure often called “Alder Lake” that’s the predecessor of the newest “Raptor Lake” included in core i5-13600K.
The twelfth era of Intel was the corporate’s first to incorporate a hybrid microarchitecture, the Alder Lake, which debuted close to the top of 2021. It was created to provide each excessive efficiency and a excessive energy economic system with an emphasis on offering the best total expertise for varied workloads. The microarchitecture incorporates a wide range of contemporary and cutting-edge applied sciences, akin to the newest CPU core design, reminiscence controller, and I/O structure.
According to Intel, Raptor Lake is a major enchancment over Alder Lake. With as much as 24 cores and 32 threads, Raptor Lake is predicated on new 10nm manufacturing expertise. The new structure, specifically made for high-demand purposes and gaming, is claimed to offer a considerable efficiency acquire. It can be claimed that Raptor Lake is way extra power-efficient than its forerunners, enabling it to ship even higher efficiency per watt.
Memory
Intel core i5-13600K and core i7-12700K each assist DDR4 and DDR5 recollections. Both have the identical 128 GB reminiscence capability. However, there are variations in bandwidth, most reminiscence speeds, and a few applied sciences supported.
The most pace at which the DDR5 reminiscence of core i7-12700K is 4800 MT/s whereas that pace is 5600 MT/s within the case of the newest era processor, the core i5-13600K. So, the core i5-13600K can carry out extra mega transfers (Million Transfers) every second.
The reminiscence bandwidth of core i5-13600K can be higher. The core i7-12700K’s bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s, whereas that of core i5-13600K is 89.6 GB/s.
Also Read: Intel i7-12700K vs Intel i7-11700K
Another distinction is about Intel® Optane™ Memory. The core i7-12700K helps Optane™ Memory of Intel, whereas the core i5-13600K doesn’t assist that. But nonetheless, the general efficiency of core i5-13600K’s reminiscence is healthier than that of core i7-12700K.
Productivity Tests (Core i7-12700K Vs. i5-13600K)
When it involves productiveness, we’re inquisitive about figuring out how properly CPUs carry out in demanding purposes and jobs. We have mentioned the efficiency of those two processors in such difficult duties. We collected the benchmarks of productiveness from Benchmark PC Tech and HWBen.
Video Encoding
We convert movies from one format to a different once we encode them. Here, we’ve coated two types of video encoding. This encoding check will help video encoders in figuring out if the i5-13600K or i7-12700K is the preferable choice.
X265
The x265 form of encoding helps us to retailer extra information with a better decision with minimal storage use. It is also referred to as High-Efficiency Video Encoding.
HEVC efficiency of two CPUs
To full the x265 encoding course of, the time taken by core i7-12700K was 583 seconds, whereas the core i5-13600K met the identical course of in 528 seconds. By saving 55 seconds of priceless time, the Intel core i5-13600K outperformed the i7-12700K in High-Efficiency Video Encoding.
X264
x264 video encoding pace of two CPUs
The core i7-12700K wanted 283 seconds to complete the x264 encoding operation, whereas the core i5-13600K required 272 seconds for that. It takes comparatively much less time to encode x264 video as a result of it’s much less demanding than x265 when it comes to processing time. The core i5-13600K once more outscored the core i7-12700K by 11 seconds.
Compression
To evaluate the compression charges of the 2 processors, the 7-Zip file archiver was used. For compression charges, the MIPS unit is used. It stands for million operations per second.
Compression pace of two CPUs
The compression price of Intel core i5-13600K was 128 MIPS, whereas this was solely 114.4 for core i7-12700K. The core i5-13600K has a considerably higher compression price. In actual figures, the core i5-13660K carried out 12% higher than i712700K.
Encryption
In the encryption course of, personal info and information are protected utilizing secret codes. Software with the Veracrypt moniker was used to check the effectivity of two CPUs within the encryption course of.
Encryption time of two CPUs
These two processors’ encryption efficiency outcomes are practically comparable. The price of the i7-12700K was 17.3 GB/s, whereas the core i5-13600K was doing encryption at 18.1 GB/s. Even if the 2 encryption speeds aren’t very totally different, the one performing faster is the core i5-13600K.
Adobe Photoshop & Aftereffects
This benchmark can help photographers in higher choice between these 2 CPUs. Adobe Aftereffects is employed in combining movement photos, visible results, and animations, whereas image modifying, product design, picture repairing, and shiny paints are all executed with Adobe Photoshop.
Performance in Adobe software program
The core i7-12700 Ok’s efficiency made it obtain scores of 1257 and 1398 in Adobe After Effects 2022 and Adobe Photoshop 2022, respectively. On the opposite hand, the core i5-13600K scored 1389 in Adobe Photoshop 2022 and 1269 in Adobe After Effects 2022.
The efficiency of core i7-12700K was higher in Adobe Photoshop 2022, whereas the core i5-13600K served higher in Adobe After Effects 2022.
Chromium Code Compile
Time for Chromium Code Compile consumed by 2 processors
In Chromium Code Compile, the occasions taken by core i7-12700K vs. core i5-13600K had been 3643 and 4223 seconds, respectively. These increased occasions point out that the Intel core i5-13600K had ~16% slower functioning than i7-12700K in Chromium Code Compile.
Cinebench R23 Scores
The Cinebench R 23 shows the workload outcomes {that a} processor achieved. The increased the scores in exams, the higher the CPU.
Cinebench R23 scores of two processors
The core i7-12700K has achieved 1950 scores in comparison with core i5-13600K which scored 1998 within the single-core check. The figures inform that the only core efficiency of core i5-13600K is superior.In the multi-core check, the core i5-13600K and core i7-12700K achieved 23396 and 22788 scores, respectively. The core i5-13600K with increased scores is once more the winner Cinebench R23 check of multi-core efficiency.
Gaming Benchmarks – 1440p (Core i7-12700K Vs. i5-13600K)
We piled the benchmarks of intensive video games like God of War, Cyberpunk 2077, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Red Dead Redemption 2, Watch Dogs Legion, and Horizon Zero Dawn to judge the gaming efficiency of those two processors. These video games had been performed at a wonderful 1440p decision for benchmarks by Mike.
Test PC Specs
The PC used for enjoying the video games had the next specs:

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
FPS, CPU temperature, and cargo in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
While enjoying the graphically demanding Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, we analyzed the efficiency studying of two processors. The core i5-13600K was producing 83 frames every second at one level, whereas the core i7-12700K was producing 73 FPS.
The highest body price throughout Assassin’s Creed Valhalla was achieved by Intel core i5-13600K. The core i7-12700K had a most body price of 123 FPS, whereas a most body price equal to 205 FPS was delivered by the core i5-13600K.
Even although the core i5-13600K reached the best FPS, it additionally approached the bottom FPS restrict. The lowest body price of 43 FPS was produced by core i5-13600K. A minimal of 48 FPS was famous for core i7-12700K.
The most necessary body price is the common FPS. During the sport, the common body price supplied by core i7-12700K was 75 FPS. While the core i5-13600K produced a median of 85 FPS. The calculations say that the core i5-13600K efficiency was ~13.33% extra admirable on common in gameplay.
The temperatures of core i5-13600K and i7-12700K had been 61 °C and 60 °C whereas enjoying Assassin’s Creed Valhalla. The two temperatures aren’t a lot totally different and aren’t excessive. Both the processors had been sustaining good temperatures.
If we depend the load on processors, the core i5-13600K was working underneath a load of 23% whereas the core i7-12700K was working underneath a 15% CPU load. Compared to the core i7-12700K, the core i5-13600K was underneath 8% increased stress.
Cyberpunk 2077
FPS, CPU temperature, and cargo in Cyberpunk 2077
When we examined the efficiency readings of two processors in Cyberpunk 2077, the core i5-13600K was yielding 90 frames per second, and the core i7-12700K was offering 85 FPS.
The most body price for the core i7-12700K was 145 FPS, whereas the utmost body price for the core i5-13600K was 141 FPS. Opposite to Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, in Cyberpunk 2077, the Intel core i7-12700K achieved the best body price in Cyberpunk 2077.
The core i5-13600K produced the body price with the bottom worth of 45 FPS core i7-12700K was recorded at a minimal body price of twenty-two. Thus, the core i7-12700K had a minimal body price on this recreation, whereas in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, the core i5-13600K had a minimal FPS.
The core i7-12700K delivered a median body price of 86 FPS all through the sport. The core i5-13600K generated a median of 87 frames per second. In Cyberpunk 2077, the competitors between the core i7-12700K vs. core i5-13600K was fierce, as evidenced by the distinction of only one common body price.
The core i5-13600K was working underneath a load of 40%, whereas the core i7-12700K was working underneath a load of 34%. Once once more, the core i5-13600K was working underneath a heavier load than the core i7-12700K.
Similar Guides: Core i5-13600k vs i5-12600k
While enjoying Cyberpunk 2077, the core i5-13600K had a temperature of 63 °C, and i7-12700K had a 65 °C temperature. Compared to the opposite CPU, the core i7-12700K was 2 levels hotter.
God Of War
FPS, CPU temperature, and cargo in God of War
In God of War, the instantaneous FPS supplied by core i7-12700K was increased than these of core i5-13600K. The momentous body price for the core i7-12700K was 105 FPS, which is 5 greater than the core i5-13600K’s body price of 100 FPS.
The lowest worth of body price was 48 FPS obtained from the core i5-13600K in God of War. The minimal FPS produced by core i7-12700K was 62, which is 17 FPS higher than the competitor. The situation was the alternative within the final recreation, the place the core i7-12700K met the minimal FPS threshold.
In God of War, the Intel core i5-13600K had a most body price of 267 FPS, whereas the core i7-12700K had a most body price of 202 FPS. The core i5-13600K took a major lead when it comes to producing the best FPS.
Throughout the complete playtime, the core i7-12700K produced a median body price of 99 FPS. The common body price produced by the core i5-13600K was 96 frames per second. The scenario has utterly rotated in God of War. This is the primary recreation through which the Intel core i7-12700K is proving extra worthwhile with common efficiency than the core i5-13600K.
The body occasions taken by core i5-13600K and i7-12700K on this recreation had been 9.8 and 9.3 milliseconds, respectively. Since the perfect body time is all the time the minimal, so the efficiency of the core i7-12700K was higher with the effectivity of 0.5 ms per body.
The core i5-13600K was working at 54% load, whereas core i7-12700K was working at 56% load. The core i7-12700K was working tougher than the core i5-13600K and had a 2% higher load on it.
If we point out the temperature, the core i5-13600K and i7-12700K had temperatures of 54 °C and 56 °C, respectively, whereas enjoying God of War. The core i7-12700K ran 2 levels hotter once more than the core i5-13600K. But it additionally delivered a greater efficiency on this recreation juxtaposed to the superior working of core i5-13600K in Cyberpunk 2077.
Red Dead Redemption 2
FPS, CPU temperature, and cargo in Red Dead Redemption 2
The instantaneous body charges (FPS) provided by the core i5-13600K had been increased in Red Dead Redemption 2. The core i5-13600K had a major instantaneous body price of 110 FPS, which is 17 frames per second greater than the core i5-13600 Ok’s body price of 93 FPS.
In Red Dead Redemption 2, the core i7-12700K’s 33 FPS price was the bottom recorded. The core i5-13600K had 57 minimal frames per second, which is 24 extra frames per second than the rival.
The most body price for the Intel core i5-13600K was 399 FPS, whereas the utmost body price for the core i7-12700K was 194 FPS in RDR 2. In this recreation, the utmost FPS produced by the core i5-13600K was terribly implausible as a result of it was greater than twice as excessive as the utmost FPS produced by the core i7-12700K. The 399 FPS is finest at a excessive decision of 1440p.
The core i7-12700K supplied a median body price of 101 FPS all through RDR 2, whereas the core i5-13600K was able to turning over 117 FPS common. When it got here to producing extra FPS, in Intel core i7-12700K vs. Intel core i5-13600K, the core i5-13600K wins the FPS competitors with a lead of 17 common FPS or ~16.8% extra helpful rendition.
In RDR 2, the core i5-13600K and i7-12700K had temperatures of 59 °C and 52 °C, respectively. The core i7-12700K ran 7 levels cooler than the core i7-12700K.
Read

The load on the core i5-13600K was 13%, whereas the load on the core i7-12700K was 9%. The very low load on each processors means that the CPU shouldn’t be underneath as a lot stress in RDR 2.
Horizon Zero Dawn
FPS, CPU temperature, and cargo in Horizon Zero Dawn
During the gameplay of Horizon Zero Dawn, the core i7-12700K was pushing yet another body per second once we investigated the efficiency of two processors. The core i5-13600K was committing an instantaneous body price of 130 FPS, whereas the core i7-12700 Ok’s body price of 131 FPS.
In Horizon Zero Dawn, the bottom FPS price by core i7-12700K was 70. A minimal body price of 67 was noticed for the core i5-13600K, 3 lower than the challenger. The minimal of each CPUs on this recreation shouldn’t be very low, just like the lowest in Cyberpunk 2077.
The Intel core i5-13600K may produce a max of 199 frames per second, however the core i7-12700K generated 208 frames per second at its max. In Horizon Zero Dawn, the outcomes of minimal FPS readings are reversed in RDR 2. In RDR 2, the max FPS was supplied by core i5-13600K whereas within the current recreation, core i7-12700K has attained max limits.
Throughout Horizon Zero Dawn, the core i7-12700K delivered a median body price of 131 FPS, whereas the core i5-13600K may produce a median of 128 FPS. This is the second recreation through which the common efficiency of core i7-12700K is superior.
The temperatures of the i5-13600K and i7-12700K cores in RDR 2 had been 71 °C and 60 °C, respectively. Horizon Zero Dawn was tougher on the core i5-13600K, as evidenced by its 11 °C increased temperature.
The core i5-13600K was underneath 45% load, whereas core i7-12700K was underneath 54% load. These CPU masses are comparatively increased in Horizon Zero Dawn than in RDR 2.
Watch Dogs Legion
FPS, CPU temperature, and cargo in Watch Dogs Legion
During the interval of Watch Dogs Legions, once we assessed the efficiency of two CPUs, the core i5-13600K was driving 15 extra frames per second than the core i7-12700K. The body charges on the time had been 103 FPS by core i5-13600K and 88 FPS by core i7-12700K.
The most body price for the Intel Core i5-13600K was 139 FPS, whereas it was 117 FPS for the core i7-12700K. The core i5-13600K was in a position to ship the best FPS in Watch Dogs Legions, nevertheless, in Horizon Zero Dawn, the core i7-12700K had reached most efficiency.
The lowest body price in Watch Dogs Legion was delivered by Intel core i7-12700K. The lowest FPS by core i7-12700K was 34, whereas the core i5-13600K was discovered to have a minimal body price of 48, 14 higher than the opponent. However, the 1% low FPS generated was 66 by i5-13600K and 68 by i7-12700K.
In phrases of the common body price, the efficiency of core i5-13600K was virtually 12% higher than i7-12700K on this recreation. The core i5 13600K got here up with a median body price of 101 FPS, whereas the common price of 89 FPS was secured by the core i7-12700K. Again the outcomes are the reverse of the earlier recreation (Horizon Zero Dawn), through which core i7-12700K had a extra passable efficiency on common.
Also Check: i7-13700K Vs i5-13600K
The body time of the 2 processors was considerably totally different in Watch Dogs Legion. The core i7-12700K was taking 12.5 ms per body, whereas the core i5-13600K was delivering every body in 8.2 ms. The core i5-13600K had a time effectivity of 4.4 milliseconds or ~52.5%.
In Watch Dogs Legion, the core i5-13600K and core i7-12700K had temperatures of 61 °C and 59 °C, respectively. The core i5-13600K has dropped its temperature by 10 °C from Horizon Zero Dawn to Watch Dogs Legion.
The load on each processors was fairly comparable on this gameplay. The core i5-13600K was managing 37% load, whereas there was 38% load on core i7-12700K.
Overall Gaming Performance (Core i7-12700K Vs. i5-13600K)
The finest metrics for assessing the mixed gaming efficiency of processors are body charges and body time. Here is a short dialogue of them.
Frame Rate
The imply of the usual, worst, and finest body charges for every graphics card within the video games are necessary elements to think about when evaluating the gaming efficiency of two GPUs. The graph shows the efficiency of two graphics playing cards in video games whose benchmarks have already been mentioned on this information.
Average body charges provided by two CPUs
The core i7-12700K supplied a median of 96.8 FPS, whereas the core i5-13600K delivered 102.5 common FPS. The common by core i5-13600K is almost 6% finer than the opponent. However, the core i7-12700K had a unique conduct in “God of War” and “Horizon Zero Dawn”. In these video games, core i7-12700K contributed a extra common body price.
The common minimal FPS is ~14.5% decrease within the case of core i7-12700K. The lowest FPS common of core i7-12700K was 44.8, whereas core i5-13600K had 51.3 FPS at its common minimal.
If we discuss concerning the common most FPS via all video games, the core i5-13600K achieved a rating of 225 FPS, whereas the core i7-12700K had a median most of 164.8 FPS. If we calculate the share lead, the core i5-13600K’s most FPS was ~36.5% increased than the common max of core i7-12700K. However, in some video games, the utmost efficiency was the alternative core i7-12700K supplied increased max FPS in “Horizon Zero Dawn” and “God of War”.
Frame Time
The common quantity of body time utilized determines the gaming effectivity of a CPU. It impacts the sport expertise in varied methods; for instance, it impacts reloading time, taking pictures targets, and many others. Higher body time may cause you to overlook your goal or might reload a gun these days.
Mean body time for 2 CPUs
The common body time in all video games calculated for core i5-13600K was 9.4 milliseconds, whereas the common body got here out to be 10.9 ms for core i7-12700K. Thus, the common time supplied by core i7-12700K was 1.5 ms seconds smaller; thus, ~16% higher efficiency was given by core i7-12700K when it comes to the body time.
CPU Load
Since the video games demand higher efficiency from the GPU than the CPU, the CPU masses are decrease compared to GPU masses. The common CPU masses are given within the following graph.
Average load on processors in gaming
The common load on Intel core i5-13600K was increased in load comparability of Intel core i7-12700K vs. Intel core i5-13600K throughout video games whose efficiency has already been reviewed.
The core i5-13600K had a load common of 29.83%, while the core i7-12700K had a load common of 27.67%. However, the load on core i7-12700K in Horizon Zero Dawn was greater than that on core i5-13600K. A better CPU load may end in increased energy consumption, which might enhance the value of your electrical energy invoice.
Thermal Efficiency
The well being of a CPU could also be impacted when its temperature is larger over an prolonged interval.
Average temperatures all through video games
The total temperature common of core i5-13600K was increased in comparison with core i7-12700K. The common temperature of core i7-12700K got here out to be 58.7 °C which is 2.8 °C lower than the common temperature of 61.5 °C for core i5-13600K. In “Cyberpunk 2077” and “God of War,” the core i7-12700K had the alternative conduct as a result of it confirmed a better temperature than core i5-13600K in these video games.
Price & Availability
Intel accredited the retail worth of core i5-13600K to be $319.00 – $329.00 for patrons, whereas the proposed worth of core i7-12700K from Intel is $450.00 – $460.00. These are the launching processes of two processors.
However, should you go to the market proper now, you’ll be able to simply discover a core i7-12700K for $350. At the identical time, the present market worth of Intel core i5-13600K is 320$, which is identical as really helpful by Intel.
In phrases of availability, each the Intel core i7-12700K and Intel core i5-13600K are available in each on-line and offline markets. You can organize them straight from the Intel retailer, Amazon, eBay, and many others.
Which One Should You Go For?
The rivalry of Intel core i7-12700K vs. Intel core i5-13600K was one of many hardest CPU competitions. Let’s summarise the options and efficiency of two CPUs.
The core i7-12700K has a extra efficiency core, whereas the Intel i5-13600K has double effectivity cores. The complete cores of core i5-13600K are greater than these of core i7-12700K.
The base clock frequencies of P-cores and E-cores of Intel core i7-12700K are increased than core i5-13600K whereas at turbo frequencies, P and E cores function oppositely. The total turbo clock of core i5-13600K is increased than that of i7-12700K.
Both processors assist DDR4 and DDR5 recollections, however the reminiscence pace and bandwidth of Intel i5-13600K are higher than i7-12700K. The core i7-12700K has the extra assist of Intel® Optane™ Memory. The built-in graphics of each processors are Intel® UHD Graphics 770, which have 2 execution items and 0.3 GHz base and 1.5 GHz turbo frequencies.
Both CPUs have the identical most junction temperature of 100 °C. The base thermal design powers of each CPUs are additionally the identical at 125 watts. However, the max TDP of core i7-12700K is 190 watts in comparison with 181 watts of core i5-13600K.
In productiveness exams, their efficiency was fantastic. The core i5-13600K had higher leads to video encoding, encryption, and compression. While the core i7-12700K carried out properly in Adobe Photoshop 2022 and Chromium Code Compile.
In gaming efficiency, the general outcomes had been in favor of core i5-13600K. However, the efficiency of core i7-12700K was additionally implausible.
After all this, we suggest you go for the Intel core i5-13600K as a result of it offers a higher efficiency/worth ratio.
Next: Core i5-13600k vs Core i5-12600k
Common Questions AnsweredWhich processor has a extra vital variety of cores, core i7-12700K or core i5-13600K?The Intel core i5-13600K comes with a higher variety of cores. Its 6 efficiency and eight effectivity cores make a complete of 14 cores, whereas core i7-12700K has 8 efficiency and 4 effectivity cores, making 12 cores total. What is the reminiscence distinction between core i7-12700K and core i5-13600K?These two processors have the identical 128 GB storage, and so they assist each DDR4 and DDR5 reminiscence varieties. However, the reminiscence pace of DDR5 and bandwidth are higher for Intel core i5-13600K.Which CPU, the core i7-12700K or core i5-13600K, performs higher for cinematography and picture manipulation? The Intel core i5-13600K performs higher in videography and photograph modifying. Its Adobe Photoshop scores are increased than these of core i7-12700K.Does Intel i7-12700K present higher gaming efficiency higher than the core i5-13600K?The gaming efficiency of the Intel core i5-13600K is superior. However, the core i7-12700K’s efficiency shouldn’t be a lot totally different in comparison with core i5-13600K.Which CPU gives a greater worth for cash, core i7-12700K or core i5-13600K?The Intel core i5-13600K offers higher bang for the buck. Because its worth is lower than the core i7-12700K and it additionally has improved efficiency, Intel i5-13600K is a extra appropriate choice.