Graphics playing cards are probably the most essential items of {hardware} for avid gamers. Because most PC fanatics are avid gamers, we should focus on graphics playing cards on occasion. Also, despite the fact that most pc tech channels often focus on high-end graphics playing cards, lower-end GPUs are essential. Therefore, at this time, let’s look at the RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600 graphics playing cards.
Due to their decrease costs, these NVIDIA and AMD choices are an ideal choice to start out your gaming adventures. Although, utilizing both the RTX 3050 or the RX 6600 GPUs will give you 60 FPS at 1080P decision. So, in case you’re on the lookout for one thing above that, we suggest testing our RX 6600 XT Vs RTX 3060 article!
Key Takeaways
Even although the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a decrease MSRP, its present worth exceeds the AMD Radeon RX 6600’s.
While the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 consumes extra energy, its temperatures are usually decrease.
Because the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a higher base and enhance clock, it affords higher efficiency.
Although each GPUs are nice for entry-level 1080P gaming, neither can afford raytracing.
Comparing Specifications
Before we get into the gaming benchmark checks, it’s essential to take a look at the on-paper specs of each graphics playing cards. These specs inform us what to anticipate, and we will create a performance-per-dollar ratio for each graphics playing cards.
RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600
Name
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
AMD RX 6600
Node
Samsung 8nm
TSMC 7nm
Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 2.0
CUDA Cores/Stream Processors
2560
1792
Core Clock
1552 MHz
1626 MHz
Boost Clock
1777 MHz
2491 MHz
Memory
8GB GDDR6
8GB GDDR6
Memory Clock
14 Gbps
14 Gbps
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
224 GB/s
RT Cores
20
28
Tensor Cores
80
N/A
Transistors
12 billion
11.06 billion
TDP
130W
132W
Power Connector
1 x 8 pin
1 x 8 pin
Launch Year
January 27, 2022
October 13, 2021
MSRP
$249
$329
Current Price
$300
$240
Firstly, trying on the desk, there are a number of notable issues throughout the uncooked specs of each graphics playing cards. For instance, the CUDA Core quantity is considerably larger for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. However, the only real variety of CUDA cores can’t be used for comparability as a result of AMD makes use of a special know-how.
Secondly, the distinction in clock speeds is not any joke both. To clarify, the AMD RX 6600 has a better base and enhance clock. Although, the AMD RX 6600 received’t all the time run at over 2 GHz speeds. Also, the AMD RX 6600 has a barely larger variety of RT Cores however a decrease variety of transistors.
Lastly, trying on the worth, there’s a noticeable worth hole between each GPUs. While MSRP costs state a special story, we’ll solely have a look at the present costs discovered on-line. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 prices ~25% greater than the AMD RX 6600. So, the RTX 3050 must carry out 25% sooner to have higher worth than its competitor.
RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600 Gaming Benchmarks
In any case, after trying on the on-paper specs, let’s prepare for the actual deal. Because we’re evaluating two graphics playing cards, the easiest way to check their efficiency is thru a number of video games. That’s why we’re trying on the benchmarks performed by Testing Games by a complete of eight video games. Above all, we will decipher each graphics playing cards’ efficiency per greenback worth by these checks.
Testing Rig
Starting with the processor, utilizing the Intel Core i9 12900K will scale back any bottlenecks from the processor facet. Because our foremost aim is to check graphics playing cards, we don’t want any exterior variables ruining the benchmarks.
Furthermore, shifting in direction of the motherboard, utilizing the MSI MPG Z690 will present higher voltage management. Although we received’t have a look at overclocking, energy supply is a critical concern with high-end tech. Therefore, a strong motherboard with stronger VRMs and MOSFETs is most well-liked.
Subsequently, RAM is a crucial a part of the PC too. While the RAM doesn’t play a direct position within the FPS of a sport, it might bottleneck the CPU and GPU by slower information cycles. Thus, the newest DDR5 RAM working at 5200 MHz is a superb choice.
Moreover, even when an AIO shouldn’t be utilized, the Dark Hero Pro 4 ought to present sufficient cooling for the processor. Although, as a result of the processor shouldn’t be the primary concern for this benchmark, water cooling would have been the higher choice.
In any case, trying on the storage, using the Samsung 970 EVO NVMe M.2 drive will lower load instances. In temporary, the sooner load instances will additional lower body instances throughout the video games.
Lastly, inspecting the facility provide, utilizing an 850W energy provide is a should with an Intel twelfth gen processor. Also, including an RTX 3000 collection card and an RX 6000 collection card will solely improve energy utilization. So, the upper watt energy provide will guarantee no issues with energy supply.
God of War
Testing God of War for low-end AMD and NVIDIA graphics playing cards at 1080P decision.
Beginning our benchmarks with God of War, the sport is supremely widespread amongst all types of avid gamers. Also, seeing that God of War requires a high-end PC, it’s the excellent sport for GPU comparisons.
Firstly, trying on the GPU wattage, there’s a seen hole between each mid-range graphics playing cards. But, despite the fact that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 makes use of extra energy, at 135W, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 performs higher. Similarly, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a wattage utilization of 121W. Be that as it might, a better wattage utilization ought to imply higher FPS, which isn’t the case in God of War.
Secondly, instantly linked with wattage consumption, we’ve temperatures. While the AMD Radeon RX 6600 makes use of decrease energy, the temperatures of each GPUs are the identical. Because the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 consumes larger energy however has comparable temperatures, we assume it has a greater TDP. But we will discover out for positive by the opposite benchmarks.
Thirdly, reviewing the body instances, we see a serious hole between each graphics playing cards. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median body time of 29.4ms. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median body time of 19.5ms. So, the Radeon RX 6600 has ~50.7% sooner frames than its rival.
Lastly, as the facility utilization of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is larger, it ought to have a better FPS. However, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a major benefit. With a median of 57 FPS in comparison with the 35 of the RTX 3050, the RX 6600 is ~62.8% sooner. Thus, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a greater efficiency per greenback on account of being ~25% cheaper.
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarks.
For the second sport in our RTX 3050 vs RX 6600 gaming benchmarks, we’ve Cyberpunk 2077. Due to its extraordinarily difficult-to-run necessities, Cyberpunk 2077 is a must have sport when benchmarking processors and graphics playing cards. Because we’re testing mid-range graphics playing cards, the sport’s settings have been lowered to medium.
In any case, there’s a main distinction between the wattage utilization of each graphics playing cards. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 consumes over 140W of energy. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 consumes ~107W of energy. So, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 ought to have larger temperatures and higher FPS below very best circumstances. But, as you’ll be able to see, that doesn’t appear to be the case.
Subsequently, trying on the temperatures, there’s a slight distinction within the temperatures of each GPUs. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has common temperatures as much as 61C. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has common temperatures as much as 59C. Even although the AMD Radeon RX 6600 consumes considerably decrease energy, the temperature hole is sort of non-existent. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has higher thermal effectivity.
Additionally, whereas body instances aren’t crucial facet of benchmarking checks, an enormous hole can have an effect on gaming efficiency. That is to say, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median latency of ~17.1ms. But, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median latency of ~13.7ms. So, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has ~24.8% sooner frames. While the distinction doesn’t matter in single-player video games, aggressive avid gamers want sooner latencies.
In conclusion, speaking concerning the common FPS, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has the lead by averaging 76 FPS. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 56 FPS. Overall, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ~35.7% sooner than the RTX 3050 whereas additionally costing ~25% much less.
Control
Control FPS benchmark.
Moving on to probably the greatest raytracing video games on the market, we’re taking a look at Control for the subsequent benchmark. To that finish, as a result of Control requires a high-end graphics card, raytracing has been turned off for the sake of the benchmark.
Firstly, as we’ve seen from the opposite titles, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a massively larger energy consumption. To clarify, on the one hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 consumes 137W of energy. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 consumes 119W of energy. So, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 ought to carry out higher with larger temperatures.
Secondly, after the facility consumption, we should have a look at the temperatures for each graphics playing cards. Because a better wattage consumption is instantly proportional to larger temperatures. However, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median temperature of 54C. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median temperature of 59C. So, even with the upper energy consumption, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has decrease temperatures.
Thirdly, speaking concerning the body instances, the hole between each graphics playing cards has slimmed down for the reason that earlier title. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages latencies of 13.4ms. Consequently, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages latencies of 12.7ms. So, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has ~5.5% slower frames than its opponent.
Lastly, we see that the AMD Radeon RX 6600 performs pretty higher by analyzing the common FPS of each GPUs. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 70 FPS. Whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median FPS of 84. Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ~20% sooner than its rival. Although the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 prices 25% extra, it’s 20% slower in rasterization efficiency.
Days Gone
Days Gone: 1080P efficiency benchmarks.
After the gorgeous raytracing sport, we’ve Days Gone for our subsequent benchmark. While the sport shouldn’t be extraordinarily troublesome to run, it requires a high-end GPU for max settings. For that purpose, mid-high settings are utilized within the title.
By and huge, we see comparable statistics in energy utilization as we’ve within the earlier titles. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 makes use of ~140W of energy. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 makes use of ~119W of energy. So, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is extraordinarily energy environment friendly whereas offering superb efficiency. However, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has proven higher thermals.
Subsequently, trying into the temperatures, we see one other victory for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. Although the AMD Radeon RX 6600 makes use of decrease energy, its temperatures are barely larger than its opponent’s. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 56C temperatures, however the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 64C. So, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has higher thermal effectivity, whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has higher energy effectivity.
Moreover, whereas body instances aren’t extraordinarily essential for single-player video games, they’re of the essence for aggressive video games. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is a lot better than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 relating to body latencies. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages latencies as much as 13.6ms. Whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 8.9ms latencies. Thus, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has ~52.8% sooner frames than its competitor.
In conclusion, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ~40.8% sooner than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 by analyzing the FPS. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 71 FPS, whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 100 FPS. So, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has higher efficiency per greenback worth.
Forza Horizon 5
Forza Horizon 5 GPU benchmark check at excessive settings at 1080P decision.
For our subsequent RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600 benchmark check, we’ve Forza Horizon 5. While the sport shouldn’t be CPU intensive, it requires fairly a high-end GPU to run at max settings. For that purpose, Forza Horizon 5 is a superb sport to check graphics playing cards.
Firstly, going by the facility utilization of each graphics playing cards, surprisingly, there isn’t a lot distinction between each GPUs. In abstract, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median energy consumption of 107W. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median energy consumption of 106W. So, we see that each graphics playing cards make the most of the identical quantity of energy.
Secondly, as a result of larger energy draw equates to larger temperatures, let’s have a look at which GPU has higher thermal effectivity. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median temperature of 56C. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median temperature of 60C. While the AMD Radeon RX 6600 makes use of much less energy, it’s 4C hotter than its competitor. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has higher thermal effectivity.
Thirdly, speaking concerning the body instances, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 miserably loses in opposition to the AMD RX 6600. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has common body latencies of as much as 9.0ms. Similarly, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has common body latencies of as much as 7.1ms. Because of the distinction, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has ~26.7% slower frames.
Lastly, we analyze the common FPS of each GPUs and notice that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is extraordinarily gradual. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 102 FPS, whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 154 FPS. Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ~50.9% sooner than its rival.
Hitman 3
Hitman 3 benchmark check at 1080P extremely settings.
After trying by a heavy racing-type sport, we’ve Hitman 3, a stealth-based sport for the subsequent title. While Hitman 3 is a number of years previous, it requires a high-end PC to run at extremely settings with raytracing. But as a result of we’re testing mid-range GPUs, raytracing is disabled for the title.
In any case, speaking about energy utilization, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 exhibits its excessive utilization as soon as once more. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has an influence consumption of ~136W. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has an influence consumption of ~106W. So, below very best circumstances, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 must be cooler and have a decrease FPS than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050.
Subsequently, each graphics playing cards present comparable temperatures once we have a look at the temperatures. Even although the AMD Radeon RX 6600 makes use of considerably decrease energy, it’s 1C hotter than its competitor. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median of 58C. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median of 59C. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has higher thermal effectivity.
Moreover, as we transfer in direction of the body instances, we notice there isn’t an enormous distinction in comparison with earlier than. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX has latencies as much as 8.4ms. Similarly, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has latencies as much as 7.8ms. To that finish, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050’s frames are ~7.6% slower.
In conclusion, as we examine the common FPS of each graphics playing cards, we discover a large distinction in efficiency. In abstract, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 107 FPS. On the opposite, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 143 FPS. Therefore, the RX 6600 is ~33.6% sooner, whereas the RTX 3050 is ~25% costlier.
Horizon Zero Dawn
Horizon Zero Dawn: 1080P benchmarks.
Now, coming in direction of an adventurous title with a variety of motion, we’ve Horizon Zero Dawn for the subsequent check. Because the sport depends closely on the graphics card, it’s excellent for GPU comparisons.
Firstly, going by the facility utilization, we see a slight hole within the energy consumption of each graphics playing cards. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has an influence consumption of ~121W. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has an influence consumption of ~104W. For that purpose, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 ought to get a decrease FPS whereas staying cooler.
Secondly, trying on the temperatures, there’s a marginal hole between the temperatures of each mid-range GPUs. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median temperature of 61C. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median temperature of 60C. So, even with larger energy consumption, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has comparable temperatures as its rival. What’s extra, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is extra thermally environment friendly than the AMD GPU.
Thirdly, shifting towards the body instances, we discover that each graphics playing cards present horrible body latencies. However, the body instances received’t deter gameplay as a result of Horizon Zero Dawn isn’t aggressive. Even so, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has common latencies of as much as 15.5ms. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has common latencies of as much as 12.4ms. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has ~25% slower frames than its competitor.
Lastly, reviewing the FPS exhibits an enormous distinction between each GPUs. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 62 FPS. Whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 78 FPS. Therefore, the RX 6600 wins the RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600 struggle with a whopping ~25.8% efficiency increment.
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Microsoft Flight Simulator: gaming benchmarks.
For the final sport on this collection of benchmarks, we’ve Microsoft Flight Simulator. Because the sport requires a high-end graphics card, it’s a nice title to check graphics playing cards. Also, the open-world nature of Microsoft Flight Simulator requires a quick processor.
In any case, going by the facility consumption of each GPUs, we see main variations in energy consumption. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 consumes 136W of energy. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 consumes ~103W of energy. So, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 ought to carry out higher and have larger temperatures. However, the perfect circumstances are barely met within the present benchmarks.
Subsequently, trying on the temperatures, there’s a slight temperature hole between each graphics playing cards. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has a median temperature of 65C. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has a median temperature of 62C. While the facility consumption variations are considerably larger, the temperature hole is minimal. For that purpose, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is extra thermally environment friendly.
Moreover, speaking concerning the body instances, there’s one other huge hole within the body latencies of each graphics playing cards. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has common latencies of as much as 19.5ms. Whereas the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has common latencies of as much as 15.1ms. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 has ~29.1% slower frames than its opponent.
In conclusion, reviewing the FPS exhibits us a serious distinction in efficiency between each GPUs. In abstract, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 51 FPS. On the opposite, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 66 FPS. Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ~29.4% sooner than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 in Microsoft Flight Simulator.
RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600 Gaming Benchmarks Verdict
Now that we’ve checked out eight video games from completely different genres and corporations, let’s see which GPU is healthier. Of course, these outcomes are primarily based on complete efficiency improve, thermal effectivity, body latencies, and efficiency per greenback worth. Above all, as a result of each shopper has private preferences, we should think about each risk whereas giving our verdicts.
Firstly, trying on the thermal effectivity of each graphics playing cards, we should observe the temperatures and energy consumption. While most comparisons have easy outcomes, these GPUs are barely difficult. To clarify, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 consumes extra energy, making it much less energy environment friendly. However, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 additionally has decrease or comparable temperatures to the AMD Radeon RX 6600. Thus, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is extra thermally environment friendly than its opponent.
Secondly, speaking concerning the body instances, it’s obvious that the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has considerably sooner frames. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 shouldn’t be your cup of tea in case you’re a aggressive gamer. Because of the slower frames, avid gamers will discover it troublesome to win aggressive video games the place each second issues.
Thirdly, by reviewing the general common FPS from all video games, we see that the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is considerably sooner. In temporary, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 averages 554 frames in eight video games. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 averages 758 frames in eight video games. So, relating to sooner efficiency, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the clear winner.
Lastly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 prices ~25% greater than the AMD Radeon RX 6600. In abstract, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is ~36.8% sooner than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050. So, not solely do you get monetary savings by getting the AMD Radeon RX 6600, however you additionally get higher efficiency.
Who Is This Article For?
To clarify, the RTX 3050 Vs RX 6600 article is for customers who can’t resolve which GPU to purchase. While each graphics playing cards open the gates to entry-level 1080P gaming, efficiency per greenback is essential to grasp. If you’ve got the price range for a greater GPU, we suggest going by our RTX 3060 Vs RTX 3070 article!
Nonetheless, we began the article with a easy on-paper comparability of the specs of each GPUs. Not solely does it enable us to get a tough thought of what to anticipate, however we will differentiate costs. What’s extra, the worth distinction creates a gateway to calculate each graphics playing cards’ efficiency per greenback worth.
Subsequently, after evaluating the specs, we regarded on the testing rig for the benchmarks. Moreover, we targeted on the body instances, energy consumption, temperatures, and efficiency per greenback worth for the sport benchmarks.
Lastly, after discussing the benchmarks, we regarded on the last verdict for each graphics playing cards. Although the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 is extra thermally environment friendly, it consumes extra energy. Also, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 has considerably higher efficiency whereas costing much less.
Was our article useful? 👨💻
👍Yes
👎No
Thank you! Please share your optimistic suggestions. 🔋
How may we enhance this publish? Please Help us. 😔
Submit
https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vdGVjaDRnYW1lcnMuY29tL3J0eC0zMDUwLXZzLXJ4LTY2MDAv0gEA?oc=5
