AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and RX 7900 XTX benchmarks leaked, slower than Nvidia equivalents

More particulars and benchmarks of the Radeon RX 7900 XT and 7900 XTX have surfaced on the web. However, current exams present that the Radeon GPUs are slower than the Nvidia equivalents.
The upcoming graphics playing cards are, nonetheless, a lot quicker than the last-generation RX 6950 XT. Additionally, the cheaper worth level of the RX 7000 sequence video playing cards makes them profitable GPUs to go for.

These benchmarks don’t change the truth that the Radeon RX 7900 sequence playing cards are spectacular GPUs. They are ranked among the many quickest vehicles cash can purchase. Thus, players who buy them won’t be disillusioned, despite the fact that they don’t seem to be as quick as high-end Nvidia choices.

Radeon RX 7900 XT and 7900 XTX benchmarks and how they fare in opposition to Nvidia equivalents

Videocardz reported the newest leaked benchmarks for the GPUs. They come after the Geekbench 5 benchmarks by which the RX 7900 sequence playing cards have been seen taking a lead in some circumstances.

The GPUs have been just lately examined utilizing 3DMark Time Spy and Fire Strike. These applications take a look at each the CPU and the graphics card extensively and emulate a real-life use-case state of affairs. The scores thus largely rely upon all the system and not simply the graphics card. However, no data on the take a look at bench used to check these playing cards can be found.

3DMark Time Spy benchmark scores

In Time Spy, 3DMark’s DirectX 12 benchmark, we see the RTX 4080 and the 4090 pull forward of the Radeon GPUs.

While working the benchmark within the 4K Extreme preset, the 7900 XTX scored 13,729 factors and the 7900 XT 13,687 factors. This makes the previous round 1% slower than the 4080, and the latter is round 2% behind Nvidia’s high providing. The playing cards path the RTX 4090 by round 28%.
While working the benchmark on the 1440p Extreme preset, the hole between the 2 Radeon GPUs will increase. The RX 7900 XTX scores 25,473 factors whereas the 7900 XT will get 23,987 factors. This makes the previous round 8% slower than the 4080, whereas the latter falls behind the identical Nvidia GPU by round 12% slower.
GPU name4K Ultra preset score1440p Extreme preset scoreGeforce RTX 409019,39835,704Geforce RTX 408014,00528,050Radeon RX 7900 XTX13,72925,473Radeon RX 7900 XT13,68723,897Radeon RX 6950 XT10,64421,848Geforce RTX 3090 Ti10,70921,711

Thus, the Radeon RX 7900 sequence has some disadvantages in DirectX 12 efficiency.

3DMark Fire Strike benchmark scores

In 3DMark’s DirectX 11 take a look at, the Radeon RX 7900 XTX scored 18,853 whereas working Fire Strike on the 4K Ultra preset. This makes the GPU round 24% slower than the RTX 4090 and round 7% quicker than the RTX 4080.
In the 1440p Extreme preset, the cardboard scored 37,702 factors. Thus, it’s round 18% slower than the Team Green flagship and round 8% quicker than the RTX 4080, based on Videocardz’s efficiency aggregates.

The RX 7900 XTX, nonetheless, is way quicker than the last-gen equal, the RX 6950 XT, on this benchmark. It is round 15% quicker within the 4K Ultra preset and round 16% quicker within the 1440p Extreme preset.
In Blender, the 7900 XTX is round 75% quicker than the 6950 XT however the RTX 4090 is 3.2x quicker than the XTX.In Blender, the 7900 XTX is round 75% quicker than the 6950 XT however the RTX 4090 is 3.2x quicker than the XTX. https://t.co/xYAczSsrK8
The RX 7900 XT virtually equals the RTX 4080 when it comes to total efficiency. The card scored 16,915 within the 4K Ultra preset, making it 1% slower than Nvidia’s newest launch.
The same story offered itself whereas working the benchmark at 1440p Extreme. The card scored 33,497 factors, making it about 1% slower than the 4080.

GPU name4K Ultra preset score1440p Extreme preset scoreGeforce RTX 409029,42745,704Radeon RX 7900 XTX18,85337,702Geforce RTX 408017,29433,932Radeon RX 7900 XT16,91533,497Radeon RX 6950 XT15,20130,287Geforce RTX 3090 Ti13,98926,704Thus, the Radeon playing cards stack up fairly nicely in rasterization efficiency utilizing legacy APIs.

Quick Links