RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti: Which Is Better?

After AMD launched their newest RX 7000 collection GPUs in December, fans have performed many benchmarking checks. While NVIDIA’s RTX 3000 collection is a era older, they maintain the identical value as AMD’s RX 7000 collection GPUs. Therefore, maintaining the value in thoughts, we’re testing the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti. We shall conduct a number of gaming benchmark checks to search out out which has the higher efficiency per greenback worth.
Key Takeaways

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is an improve from the RTX 3080 from NVIDIA’s older 3000-series lineup. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is one in every of AMD’s newest GPUs.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~24.76% quicker in 1440P decision and ~30.06% quicker in 4K decision.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~5% cooler than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti at 4K decision.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ~33.37% dearer than the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in MSRP.
Due to enough RT capabilities, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is perhaps higher with raytracing and DLSS enabled.

Architectural Differences
Before we leap onto the gaming benchmarks, we should know the variations between each graphics playing cards. Because each GPUs are from separate corporations, their architectural developments fluctuate considerably. Additionally, the structure of a GPU impacts its efficiency tremendously. Therefore, we should analyze how the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti have differentiated. You is perhaps fascinated with trying out our RTX 4080 Vs RTX 3080 Ti comparability to see how the cardboard performs in opposition to Nvidia’s newest lineup. 
For instance, AMD has taken a unique route for upscaling expertise from NVIDIA’s DLSS. Similarly, not like NVIDIA’s “CUDA Cores,” AMD makes use of “Stream Processors.”
RDNA 3 — AMD Radeon RX 7000 Series Architecture
AMD has steadily upgraded its GPU arsenal whereas staying near NVIDIA’s tail. After the failed “Vega” graphics playing cards, AMD has utterly turned its scenario round with the inflow of RDNA 2 GPUs. Now, with its newest RDNA 3 graphics playing cards, a number of issues have modified throughout the core structure of the GPUs.
Also Read: RTX 3060 Vs GTX 1660 Ti
For instance, with the implications of the forthcoming FSR 3.0 and the newest multi-chiplet design, AMD’s Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs have loads to supply.
Memory Cache Die
Unveiling AMD’s newest multi-chiplet design in AMD’s Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs. Source: AMD.
For its Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs, AMD has taken refuge from its Ryzen processors. To clarify, the Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs include a brand new chiplet design, significantly a multi-chiplet. Additionally, the RDNA 3 structure affords a number of dies, coined “Memory Cache Die” (MCD), every containing 16MB of L3 Cache. So, for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, that equates to 80MB of L3 Cache.
Because AMD makes use of two dies in its RDNA 3 structure, one die homes all the GPU cores, the Graphics Compute Die (GCD), whereas the opposite is the MCD. The GCD is predicated on the newest 5nm course of node, whereas the MCD is predicated on the 6nm course of node.
Due to the MCD using older expertise, it’s extra inexpensive to mass-produce, chopping down on prices. Therefore, customers may see AMD Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs value lower than its competitor. Also, because the GCD homes all of the GPU cores, the 5nm’s greater transistor density will assist enhance efficiency.
Radiance Display Engine
Display of the newest Radiance Display Engine in AMD RX 7000 collection GPUs.
For a very long time, graphics card producers haven’t touched the refresh fee of their GPUs considerably. However, with AMD’s Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs, we see a brand new show engine, coined “AMD Radiance Display Engine.” Not solely does the Radiance Display Engine showcase absurd refresh charges, nevertheless it additionally improves the 12-bit per-channel colours.
To clarify, the AMD Radiance Display Engine permits as much as 68 billion colours in its 12-bit per-channel colours. So, you shall have the ability to view much more sensible colours than ever. To prime it off, the AMD Radiance Display Engine permits as much as 165 FPS at 8K and 480 FPS at 4K resolutions. While the refresh charges go above and past the norm, we should always simply surpass 165 FPS on the highest 8K decision with future iterations of GPUs.
Also Read: Gigabyte M27Q-P Gaming Monitor Review
Fidelity FX Super Resolution 3.0
Fidelity FX Super Resolution 3.0 announcement. Source: AMD
Since AMD’s Radeon RX 6000 collection GPUs, we’ve got seen the endorsement of its upscaling expertise, “Fidelity FX Super Resolution.” Unlike NVIDIA’s Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS), FSR depends on software program to upscale pictures. With the inception of FSR 2.0, we noticed AMD deal with NVIDIA’s DLSS 2.0 head-to-head with nearly the identical efficiency.
However, AMD has now gone one step forward and has introduced its futuristic FSR 3.0, together with the Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs. According to AMD sources, FSR 3.0 might be twice as quick as FSR 2.0. So, except NVIDIA can overcome such an enormous wall with its DLSS 3.0, FSR will simply take the upscaling crown. 
Moreover, as a result of AMD makes use of software program to upscale pictures, the standard of the photographs doesn’t match the standard of DLSS. Therefore, AMD has additionally introduced AI accelerators and Fluid Motion Frames to help its FSR 3.0 expertise.
To clarify, AI accelerators are AMD’s model of NVIDIA’s Tensor Cores. In distinction, not a lot data has been launched relating to Fluid Motion Frames. Although, speculations counsel Fluid Motion Frames will assist FSR 3.0 produce distinctive frames, like DLSS 3.0.
Ampere — NVIDIA RTX 3000 Series Architecture
Moving in direction of NVIDIA’s older RTX 3000 collection structure, “Ampere,” we see a unique structure utilized. As we’re evaluating the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti GPUs, realizing the distinction within the structure of the whole era will assist differentiate efficiency.
Although the AMD Radeon RX 7000 collection GPUs are newer, the pricing and thermals have confused customers. Moreover, the utilization of raytracing and upscaling applied sciences provides to the confusion.
Process Node
When speaking about next-gen {hardware}, many fans all the time anticipate enhancements within the course of node. Not solely does a smaller course of node enhance the thermal effectivity of a GPU, nevertheless it additionally will increase the transistor density. Although, relating to course of nodes, NVIDIA is normally a bit slower when updating its lithography.
However, with its GeForce RTX 3000 collection GPUs, NVIDIA has shifted to Samsung’s 8nm course of node. In comparability, NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 2000 collection GPUs utilized TSMC’s 12nm course of node. Similarly, as a result of the method node has considerably shrunk down, Ampere GPUs have a remarkably greater transistor rely.
For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti has a transistor rely of 18.6 billion transistors. On the opposite hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti affords 28.3 billion transistors. While the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti barely has half the transistors of the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, housing 57.7 billion transistors, its efficiency is unparalleled.
Resizable BAR
Differences between information switch between resizable BAR turned on and off. Image credit: MSI
When the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3000 collection GPUs launched, the corporate launched a brand new characteristic named “NVIDIA Resizable BAR.” To clarify, the NVIDIA Resizable BAR expertise permits the switch of knowledge reminiscent of shaders, textures, and geometry with out limits. The information is transferred from the VRAM to the CPU. 
The idea vaguely resembles AMD’s Smart Access Memory (SAM) expertise. However, not like AMD’s SAM, Resizable BAR is just restricted to AMD Ryzen 5000 collection processors and above and Intel tenth gen processors and above.
While Resizable BAR and SAM are wonderful ideas, the efficiency increment is negligible. For instance, at most, you’ll be able to achieve 2-4% additional efficiency with Resizable BAR. But any type of free efficiency equates to a greater expertise.
Deep Learning Super Sampling 2.0
After launching its GeForce RTX 2000 collection GPUs, NVIDIA launched the first-ever superior upscaling expertise, “Deep Learning Super Sampling.” Although DLSS 1.0 was lackluster, it confirmed lots of promise for the longer term.
In that regard, with its GeForce RTX 3000 collection GPUs, NVIDIA launched the subsequent iteration of DLSS 1.0, the DLSS 2.0. Due to the low high quality of upscaling with the DLSS 1.0, avid gamers most popular to maintain it off. Although disabling DLSS and enabling raytracing means a major efficiency drop, the expertise wasn’t price it.
However, now with DLSS 2.0, we see higher high quality frames by upscaling and higher FPS positive factors. Even so, enabling raytracing with DLSS 2.0 may show to be a bit troublesome at greater resolutions. Therefore, NVIDIA has launched DLSS 3.0 with its GeForce RTX 4000 collection GPUs.
Similar to AMD’s FSR 3.0, NVIDIA’s DLSS 3.0 creates distinctive frames to extend FPS. But in accordance with evaluations, the distinctive frames have worse high quality than DLSS 2.0, making them pretty seen. Therefore, staying on DLSS 2.0 is perhaps higher than upgrading to DLSS 3.0. So, except for the GPU comparability, we’re additionally trying on the efficiency variations between FSR 3.0 Vs DLSS 2.0.
RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti Specifications
Through the evaluation of the architectural variations between each graphics playing cards, we’ve got discovered sure variations. Looking at their specs will present us which GPU performs higher on paper. Knowing the specs makes calculating each GPUs’ efficiency per greenback ratio simpler.

GPU Name
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Node
Samsung 8nm
TSMC 5nm (GCD), TSMC 6nm (MCD)

Architecture
Ampere
RDNA 3

CUDA Cores/ Stream Processors
10,240
5,376

Core Clock
1365MHz
1500MHz

Boost Clock
1665MHz
2394MHz

Memory
12GB GDDR6X
20GB GDDR6

Memory Clock
19 Gbps
20 Gbps

Memory Bandwidth
912.4GB/s
800GB/s

RT Cores
80
84

Tensor Cores
320
N/A

Transistors
28.3 billion
57.7 billion

TDP
350W
300W

Power Connector
1 x 12 pin
2 x 8 pin

Launch Date
June 3, 2021
December 13, 2022

MSRP
$1,199
$899

Current Price
$1,140
$900

Best Graphics Cards
Best RTX 3080 Ti Cards
Best RX 7900 XT Cards

Analyzing the desk above exhibits a number of variations between each graphics playing cards. For instance, the newer AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT follows a multi-chip die with the 5nm and 6nm course of, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti solely has an 8nm course of node. Want to see the way it performs in opposition to Nvidia’s prime card? Check out our RTX 4090 Vs RTX 3080 Ti comparability. 
Furthermore, trying on the CUDA cores, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti showcases double the quantity the AMD GPU does. However, the AMD card takes again the lead in core clocks and VRAM. Furthermore, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti requires 50W extra wattage than the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT.
Lastly, evaluating costs, we discover that the NVIDIA GPU is ~26.6% dearer than the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. So, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti must showcase 27% extra efficiency than its competitor to win the efficiency per greenback battle. However, trying on the uncooked specs, it doesn’t appear straightforward to perform for the NVIDIA GPU.
Gaming Performance At 1440P
As said above, conducting sensible benchmarks is necessary when evaluating two items of {hardware}. Not solely do sensible checks present how the {hardware} performs, however additionally they present the PC specs required to get the FPS proven. Therefore, the next RX 7900 XT vs RTX 3080 Ti 1440P benchmarks have been performed by Benchmark PC Tech.
Testing Rig

Looking on the testing rig specs for the processor, we see the Intel Core i5-13600K being utilized. Although the GPUs require extra energy, the Intel Core i5-13600K must be sufficient at greater resolutions. Due to using a much bigger 1440P decision monitor, the processor’s workload is decreased, making video games extra GPU-dependent. Therefore, you’ll be able to pair barely weaker CPUs with extra highly effective GPUs at 1440P and 4K resolutions.
Secondly, shifting towards the motherboard, we notice that the ASUS Strix Z790-F is utilized. Although the processor is a bit older, with a high-end motherboard, we guarantee a greater improve path. Also, with the Z790-F motherboard, we see higher VRMs, permitting for higher overclocking.
Furthermore, speaking concerning the RAM, we’ve got the Kingston Fury Renegade DDR5 32GB equipment. While DDR5 RAM is far quicker than DDR4, the adoption fee is gradual. Due to the upper costs and low gaming advantages, not many avid gamers want DDR5 over DDR4. However, if you wish to work on manufacturing duties, DDR5 RAM is a promising funding. If you need extra data relating to DDR4 and DDR5 RAM, we suggest studying by our DDR4 Vs DDR5 RAM comparability!
Lastly, speaking concerning the case, we’ve got the Cooler Master H500P case. Because the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT are huge playing cards, we require an enormous case. For that cause, the H500P ought to do a really perfect job housing the GPUs and maintaining the cooling in examine. Moreover, with higher cooling, the graphics playing cards may have higher thermal effectivity, additional bettering efficiency.
Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2 efficiency benchmarks at 1440P decision.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 129 FPS, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 100 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~29% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2.
Although the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is ~26.6% dearer, it loses by a excessive margin.

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla efficiency take a look at.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 127 FPS. On the opposite hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 84 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~51.19% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.

Shadow Of The Tomb Raider
Shadow of the tomb raider FPS take a look at at 1440P decision, extremely settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 181 FPS, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 156 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~16.02% quicker than its competitor within the shadow of the tomb raider. 

Also Check: RTX 3080 10GB Vs RTX 3080 12GB
Forza Horizon 5
Forza Horizon 5 gaming benchmarks at 1440P, extremely settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 122 FPS. On the opposite hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 104 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~17.3% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Forza Horizon 5.

God Of War
Testing two high-end GPUs in God of conflict at 1440P decision, max settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 146 FPS, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 112 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~30.35% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in God of War.

Dying Light 2
Dying Light 2 FPS benchmarks.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 140 FPS. On the opposite hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 110 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~27.27% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Dying Light 2. 

Elden Ring
Elden Ring comparability benchmark take a look at for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 102 FPS, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 93 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~9.6% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Elden Ring.
While the AMD GPU confirmed higher variations, the distinction is considerably lower in Elden Ring.

Gaming Performance At 4K
After inspecting the gaming benchmarks on the 1440P decision, we should see how the GPUs differ at 4K. Because we’re testing high-end GPUs, customers may purchase them for gaming at greater resolutions with a quicker refresh fee. While the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT dominated the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in 1440P, we would see totally different leads to 4K. Therefore, the next checks have been performed by Mark PC.
Testing Rig

Processor: Intel Core i9-12900K
RAM: 2x16GB G.Skill DDR4 3600MHz
Storage: Samsung 980 Pro
Graphics Card: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT & NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Starting from the processor, we see that the testing rig makes use of the Intel Core i9-12900K. While the 1440P rig utilized a more recent era processor, it’s an i5 at most. On the opposite hand, the 4K testing rig makes use of a era older i9 processor. In any case, the efficiency distinction is minimal, and a processor’s workload decreases significantly at greater resolutions. A comparability between the Intel Core i5-13600K Vs i9-12900K processors ought to make clear any points you may need.
Furthermore, the testing rig makes use of the G.Skill DDR4 2x16GB 3600MHz RAM equipment. While the 1440P rig used DDR5 RAM, the efficiency distinction is minimal in gaming. However, in the event you’re planning to make use of your PC for productive duties, then DDR5 RAM is perhaps well worth the buy. Otherwise, DDR4 RAM ought to make the lower even at 4K resolutions, with quicker speeds.
Also, the testing rig makes use of a Samsung 980 Pro SSD. Using an SSD can lower the load occasions of video games and preliminary PC bootup. So, each time potential, positively buy an SSD.
Lastly, no air coolers or water coolers have been recognized within the testing rig. However, you can not slack on the cooling with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GPUs. Therefore, you need to select an enormous chassis and use a correct air-cooled or water-cooled construct.
Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS comparability take a look at at 4K decision, extremely settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 60 FPS. On the opposite hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 40 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~50% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 74C. However, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 69C.

Red Dead Redemption 2
Red Dead Redemption 2 benchmark checks.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 94 FPS. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 72 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~30.5% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 77C. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 67C. 

Assassin’s Creed Valhalla
Assassin’s Creed Valhalla efficiency benchmark at 4K decision, extremely settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 93 FPS. However, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 61 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~52.43% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Assassin’s Creed Valhalla.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 75C. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 70C.

Watch Dogs Legion
Watch Dogs Legion GPU comparability take a look at at 4K decision.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 81 FPS, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 63 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~28.57% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Watch Dogs Legion.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 70C. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 67C. 

Similar Comparisons: RTX 4080 Vs RX 6900 XT
God Of War
God of conflict FPS take a look at at 4K decision, extremely settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 109 FPS, whereas the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 81 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~34.56% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in God of War.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 78C. Meanwhile, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 75C.

Doom Eternal
Testing two high-end GPUs in Doom Eternal at 4K decision, max settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 225 FPS, in the meantime the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 198 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~13.6% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Doom Eternal.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 73C. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 61C.

Horizon Zero Dawn
Horizon Zero Dawn benchmarks, extremely settings.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 108 FPS. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 77 FPS.
The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~40.25% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Horizon Zero Dawn.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 76C. On the opposite hand, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 74C.
Even although the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti prices ~26.6% extra, it hasn’t overwhelmed the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT even as soon as.

Overall Gaming Performance
After going by the gaming benchmarks in 1440P and 4K resolutions, let’s examine the result. While the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has dominated the board utterly, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has tried to maintain up. Furthermore, raytracing and upscaling applied sciences weren’t lively, so the checks might be totally different in any other case.
FPS
Average FPS of the RTX 3080 Ti and RX 7900 XT GPUs at 1440P and 4K resolutions.
The chart above exhibits us that the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT utterly obliterates the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in pure rasterization efficiency. To clarify, within the 1440P decision, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 947 FPS. On the opposite hand, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 759 FPS. So, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~24.76% quicker in 1440P decision.
Similarly, at 4K, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT averages 770 FPS, in the meantime the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 592 FPS. Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is ~30.06% quicker than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti at 4K decision.
Even although the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti prices ~26.6% extra, it can’t be in comparison with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. However, the outcomes might be fairly totally different if we make the most of upscaling and raytracing applied sciences.
Thermal Efficiency
Average temperatures of the RX 7900 XT and RTX 3080 Ti GPUs at 4K decision.
As the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti conflict wages on, we should take a look at the temperatures after analyzing the typical FPS. Lower GPU temperatures imply higher overclocking capabilities and a decrease likelihood of overheating parts. While the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti has a mean temperature of 74.7C, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a mean temperature of 69C.
Therefore, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT defeats the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti when it comes to efficiency and thermal effectivity. Although the temperatures are related in lots of video games, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has an total decrease mixture. 
More Comparisons: RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080
Price And Availability
Before buying any laptop {hardware}, one should all the time evaluate the MSRP and present costs. Since the pandemic, we’ve got barely seen any GPUs bought at their MSRP. However, we’re seeing fast modifications. For instance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti sells for $1,140, whereas its MSRP goes at $1,190.
Similarly, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is bought for $900 whereas its MSRP is $899. The distinction in costs is as a result of AMD GPU being more moderen whereas the NVIDIA GPU is far older.
Even so, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is at present ~26.6% dearer than the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. Therefore, when it comes to pricing, the AMD GPU is best. Also, the AMD GPU has extra availability than the NVIDIA GPU. You can simply discover each GPUs on web sites reminiscent of Amazon and Newegg.
Also Read: RTX 4090 Vs RTX 3090 Ti
Which One Should You Go For?
After going by all of the benchmarks and conclusions for the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT Vs RTX 3080 Ti GPUs, it’s time to decide on which is best. Because we’ve got primarily checked out rasterization efficiency and temperatures, we will maintain these elements in thoughts.
Firstly, if we analyze by uncooked energy, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT utterly obliterates the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti at 1440P and 4K resolutions. If we take a look at the thermal effectivity, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT nonetheless wins. However, in thermal effectivity, the distinction isn’t huge.
Furthermore, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT prices ~26.6% much less if we study the efficiency per greenback ratio. So, with the decrease value, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT outperforms its competitor, growing its efficiency per greenback ratio.
Moreover, if we deliver upscaling applied sciences and raytracing into the combination, then the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is perhaps the higher choice resulting from AMD’s lackluster raytracing capabilities. Although, till AMD’s newest FSR 3.0 launches, we will’t evaluate the upscaling applied sciences. Before leaving, be certain to take a look at our RTX 3080 vs RTX 3080 Ti comparability as properly. 
Frequently Asked QuestionsIs the RTX 3080 Ti higher than the RTX 3080?Although the distinction isn’t loads, the RTX 3080 Ti is barely quicker than the RTX 3080.Is the RTX 3080 Ti price its inflated value?Although no {hardware} is favorable with an inflated price ticket, the RTX 3080 Ti does present first rate efficiency. Depending in your use-case situation, it may be price its value.Does the RX 7900 XT help 8K decision?Thanks to its newest RDNA 3 structure, the RX 7900 XT does help as much as 8K 165Hz. However, we’ve got but to see a efficiency that may make 8K decision playable.

Was our article useful? 👨‍💻

👍Yes

👎No

Thank you! Please share your optimistic suggestions. 🔋
How might we enhance this put up? Please Help us. 😔

Submit

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiMmh0dHBzOi8vdGVjaDRnYW1lcnMuY29tL3J4LTc5MDAteHQtdnMtcnR4LTMwODAtdGkv0gEA?oc=5

Recommended For You